This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, a psychologist, regarding the definition of forensic psychology versus therapeutic roles and the potential for 'dual roles' or boundary violations. The witness confirms they are testifying in a forensic capacity subject to APA guidelines and acknowledges reviewing a letter sent by the government on April 23rd that outlined their opinions.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness / Psychologist |
Under cross-examination regarding the definition of forensic psychology and their role in the case.
|
| Unidentified Attorney (Q) | Defense Attorney (implied) |
Conducting cross-examination of the witness.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| APA |
American Psychological Association; referenced regarding forensic guidelines.
|
|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution/DOJ; sent a letter on April 23rd outlining the witness's opinions.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction (SDNY) based on the court reporter and case number.
|
""Forensic psychology" refers to the professional practice by any psychologist when applying psychology to the law to assist to address legal matters."Source
"It would be a dual role."Source
"On April 23rd, the government sent a letter outlining what the government said were your opinions in this matter."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,174 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document