This document is a clipping of a news article regarding Jeffrey Sloman's defense of the non-prosecution agreement offered to Jeffrey Epstein. Sloman, formerly second-in-command to Alexander Acosta, claims in a Miami Herald opinion piece that the decision was made due to legal impediments and terrified victims, and argues that current criticism of Acosta is politically motivated. The document notes the Justice Department's opening of an investigation into misconduct following the 'Perversion of Justice' series.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Sloman | Former prosecutor / Second-in-command to Alexander Acosta |
Defending the handling of the Epstein case; wrote an opinion piece to the Miami Herald.
|
| Alexander Acosta | Former U.S. Attorney / U.S. Secretary of Labor |
Decided whether to prosecute Epstein; subject of controversy regarding the plea deal.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Accused |
Ran a sex pyramid scheme targeting underage girls from 2001 to 2006.
|
| Aixa Montero Holt | Photographer |
Credited for the photo of Jeffrey Sloman.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Miami Herald Editorial Board |
Recipient of Sloman's opinion piece.
|
|
| Justice Department |
Opened an investigation into prosecutorial misconduct.
|
|
| U.S. Congress |
About 30 members demanded a probe.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document (implied by footer stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Dateline of the article.
|
|
|
Location where Epstein ran his scheme.
|
"legal impediments"Source
"many of Epstein’s teenage victims were too “terrified” to cooperate in the case."Source
"Given the obstacles we faced in fashioning a robust federal prosecution, we decided to negotiate a resolution"Source
"We did not reach this decision lightly and it came only after significant and often rancorous internal debate."Source
"Perversion of Justice"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,482 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document