Circa 2019 (2 weeks prior to article)
Justice Department announced investigation into prosecutorial misconduct.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Justice Department | person | 2 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023127.jpg
This document is a clipping of a news article regarding Jeffrey Sloman's defense of the non-prosecution agreement offered to Jeffrey Epstein. Sloman, formerly second-in-command to Alexander Acosta, claims in a Miami Herald opinion piece that the decision was made due to legal impediments and terrified victims, and argues that current criticism of Acosta is politically motivated. The document notes the Justice Department's opening of an investigation into misconduct following the 'Perversion of Justice' series.
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case: United States v. Lovett. The President enforced a statute to withhold compensation from employees, despite believing it was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.
1946-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: INS v. Chadha. The executive branch enforced a legislative veto, allowing for judicial review, while the Justice Department argued against the statute's constitutionality.
1983-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *United States v. Lovett*, where the President enforced a statute he believed was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.
1946-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case United States v. Lovett, where the President enforced a law he believed was unconstitutional, and the Justice Department argued against the law's constitutionality in court.
1946-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it opposed in order to allow for judicial review.
1983-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute while the Justice Department simultaneously attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
An arrest warrant was issued for Snowden, and charges were filed against him in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
2013-06-14 • Eastern District of Virginia
Charges against Snowden were filed by the Justice Department.
2013-06-14 • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
A Washington Post article reported that the Justice Department stated USIS submitted 665,000 incomplete background checks.
2014-01-23
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event