DOJ-OGR-00009409.jpg

407 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 407 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Edelstein. The questioning concerns whether Edelstein was aware of an internal investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma prior to receiving a specific letter, particularly focusing on knowledge possessed on May 12th regarding a 'suspended lawyer.' Edelstein denies awareness of an investigation on that date, admitting only to knowing about a suspended lawyer with a specific name.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness
Being questioned about knowledge of an investigation and a specific date (May 12th).
Theresa Trzaskoma Subject of inquiry
Allegedly conducted a 'mini investigation' and reported results to Edelstein.
Mr. Schectman Attorney
Attempts to object ('Judge --').
The Court Judge
Overrules Mr. Schectman's objection.
Suspended Lawyer Subject
Someone with the same name discussed on May 12th.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in footer.
US District Court
Implied by case number and 'The Court' speaker.

Timeline (1 events)

May 12th
Reporting of investigation results
Unknown

Relationships (2)

Edelstein Professional/Colleague Theresa Trzaskoma
Discussed correspondence within 'your firm' and reporting results to one another.
Edelstein Legal Representation Mr. Schectman
Schectman interjects to protect/object during Edelstein's testimony.

Key Quotes (3)

"I was not aware on May 12th of any investigation."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009409.jpg
Quote #1
"On May 12th I knew that there was a suspended lawyer with the same name."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009409.jpg
Quote #2
"Theresa Trzaskoma had previously done an investigation, some of the results of which she reported to you on May 12th"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009409.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,263 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 120 of 130
A-5805
348
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. So would you agree with me that to the extent that that
3 sentence suggested that only after the letter was received did
4 you and the others begin investigating, it was untrue because
5 you knew Theresa Trzaskoma had previously done some
6 investigation?
7 A. Someone might read that that way, but --
8 Q. Can you answer --
9 A. This is a truthful statement.
10 Q. Can you answer my question, please? Yes or no? You just
11 acknowledged that Theresa Trzaskoma had previously done an
12 investigation, some of the results of which she reported to you
13 on May 12th, correct? Correct?
14 A. On May 12th I knew that there was a suspended lawyer with
15 the same name.
16 Q. That Theresa Trzaskoma had discovered pursuant to her
17 correspondence with others in your firm in that little mini
18 investigation, correct?
19 A. I was not aware --
20 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge --
21 THE COURT: Overruled.
22 A. I was not aware on May 12th of any investigation.
23 Q. Well, Theresa Trzaskoma didn't tell you that her
24 information about the suspended lawyer came out of thin air,
25 did she?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009409

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document