HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028229.jpg

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
6
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book manuscript / memoir excerpt (part of house oversight committee production)
File Size:
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak (indicated by the header '/ BARAK /'), produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (likely related to Epstein due to Barak's association, though Epstein is not mentioned on this page). The text details diplomatic tensions during the Second Intifada (circa late 2000), focusing on a contentious meeting at the Elysée Palace with French President Jacques Chirac, US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, and Yasser Arafat. Barak describes his frustration with Arafat's alleged duplicity regarding violence and Chirac's demand for an international force.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Narrator/Israeli Prime Minister (implied)
The narrator ('I') recounting negotiations and military decisions; name appears in header '/ BARAK /'.
Jacques Chirac French President
Hosted a meeting at Elysée Palace; demanded explanations for casualty disparities.
Madeleine Albright US Secretary of State
referred to as 'Madeleine' and 'Secretary Albright'; present at the meeting.
Yasser Arafat Palestinian Leader
Accused by narrator of lying about violence and organizing attacks.
Shlomo Ben-Ami Israeli Official
Mentioned at the cut-off of the text.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Tanzim
Palestinian militant faction whose leaders the narrator named.
Israeli troops/soldiers
Military forces discussed in the context of rules of engagement.
Palestinian police
Security forces coordinated with to lower security profiles.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document production (via footer stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

Circa October 2000
Paris Summit / Meeting at Elysée Palace
Elysée Palace, Paris
Post-meeting
Attack on police post
Edge of the Old City, Jerusalem
Palestinian crowd Israeli Police

Locations (6)

Location Context
Paris, France; location of the meeting with Chirac.
Location Arafat phoned to give orders.
Jerusalem; Temple Mount area mentioned regarding police visibility.
Jerusalem; location of a police post attack.
Location of Joseph's Tomb.
Joseph's Tomb in Nablus; source of tension.

Relationships (3)

Ehud Barak Adversarial Yasser Arafat
Narrator claims Arafat lied, deserves an Oscar for acting, and is responsible for terror.
Ehud Barak Tense/Diplomatic Jacques Chirac
Narrator expresses 'surprise and frustration' at Chirac's stance.
Narrator notes Albright shared his frustration with Chirac.

Key Quotes (3)

"What he really deserved was an Oscar."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028229.jpg
Quote #1
"Arafat pretended he’d never heard of any of them, almost as if I was reading from a zoology textbook about species of polar bears."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028229.jpg
Quote #2
"Are you really saying that you’ll be happy for us to sign an agreement to end it only when another 350 Israelis are killed? I’m not playing that game."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028229.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,816 characters)

/ BARAK / 95
Chirac, but the understanding was that Madeleine would be in charge. Far from showing any willingness to end the violence, Arafat at first simply lied. He said the Palestinian violence was in response to an unprovoked assault by Israeli troops, and demanded an international “protection” force. There was a particularly bizarre moment when I read out the names of individual Tanzim leaders whom we had intercepted organizing the attacks. Arafat pretended he’d never heard of any of them, almost as if I was reading from a zoology textbook about species of polar bears. This was a man who had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. What he really deserved was an Oscar.
But people were dying. Needlessly. We ended up agreeing to a US-led fact-finding commission, as well as a number of steps to separate the Palestinian attackers and Israeli units. I reaffirmed our policy of insisting that Israeli soldiers use live fire only if they felt their lives were under threat. Arafat undertook to order his security forces and Tanzim not to launch further attacks. He even phoned Gaza with what we were given to understand were explicit orders. But it was all for show, as we discovered when we were invited to the Elysée Palace to meet Chirac. The French President had clearly received advance word from Arafat about his demand for an international “protection” force, presumably with a role for the French. To my surprise and frustration, and Secretary Albright’s as well, Chirac insisted that no agreement was acceptable without that happening. Then, he turned to me, demanding to know why the violence had left nearly 400 Palestinians dead, but barely two dozen Israelis, if the Palestinians were the aggressors. “Mr President,” I said, “just several weeks ago we were prepared to go very far in order to put this entire conflict behind us. It is Mr Arafat who rejected the proposal, even as a basis for negotiations. Just a basis to seek peace. He then deliberately turned to terror. We are protecting ourselves, and our soldiers. Are you really saying that you’ll be happy for us to sign an agreement to end it only when another 350 Israelis are killed? I’m not playing that game. Arafat started this. He has to stop it. We know he can, and we hold him responsible if that does not happen.”
It did not happen. We tried all we could to prevent a further deterioration. I approved moves, in co-ordination with the Palestinian police, to lower our security profile where possible. We made sure Israeli police were not visible from the mosques on the Haram al-Sharif. But after the next Friday prayers, a crowd made its way to a police post at the edge of the Old City and attacked it. In Nablus, the burial site of Joseph had long been a source of tension. Shlomo Ben-Ami reached
381
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028229

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document