DOJ-OGR-00010047.jpg
440 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / testimony
File Size:
440 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Exhibit A-5764) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The testimony centers on the preparation of a 'July 21st letter' and whether the witness met with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein to prepare for the current hearing. Brune denies meeting for hearing preparation but acknowledges they worked closely to reconstruct events for the letter, specifically referencing an email with the text 'Jesus, I do think that it's her'.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Testifying under direct examination regarding legal work and communications.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma | Associate/Colleague |
Worked with Brune on the July 21st letter; had an 'initial thought' discussed in testimony.
|
| Ms. Edelstein | Associate/Colleague |
Mentioned as someone Brune worked with.
|
| The Judge | Official |
Presiding over the hearing mentioned in the testimony.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service provider listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR Bates stamp).
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced regarding their position on the 'waiver issue'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter's name (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (2)
Worked together on July 21st letter; discussed issues before the judge.
Worked together; Brune confirmed talking with her about issues before the judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"Q. Are you referring to the 'Jesus, I do think that it's her' email? A. Yes."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010047.jpg
Quote #1
"We worked very hard on the July 21st letter to try to get it accurate, but we did not meet in preparation for this hearing."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010047.jpg
Quote #2
"I think that they know what my recollection is, and I think I know what their recollection is, because we worked so hard on the letter to reconstruct what had happened."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010047.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,440 characters)
Case 1:20-cv-03839-ALN Document 616-2 Filed 03/21/22 Page 979 of 3030
A-5764
A-5764
307
C2grdau2
Brune - direct
1 doctrine protection for the work we had done.
2 Q. You knew that those documents would significantly advance
3 the government's position on the waiver issue, correct?
4 A. No, because the July 21st letter lays it out, lays it out
5 accurately, including the fact that Ms. Trzaskoma had that
6 initial thought that it was one and the same.
7 Q. Are you referring to the "Jesus, I do think that it's her"
8 email?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. You met with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein prior to this
11 hearing, correct?
12 A. We worked together. I've certainly talked with her on many
13 occasions about the issues that are before the judge in this
14 hearing. I'm testifying from my own best recollection, but
15 I've certainly talked with them about the issues.
16 Q. How many times did you meet with them to discuss this
17 hearing?
18 A. Never. What I'm saying is I've talked about the issues
19 with them. We worked very hard on the July 21st letter to try
20 to get it accurate, but we did not meet in preparation for this
21 hearing.
22 Q. So, you didn't discuss what your answers would be?
23 A. I think that they know what my recollection is, and I think
24 I know what their recollection is, because we worked so hard on
25 the letter to reconstruct what had happened.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010047
C2grdau2
Brune - direct
1 doctrine protection for the work we had done.
2 Q. You knew that those documents would significantly advance
3 the government's position on the waiver issue, correct?
4 A. No, because the July 21st letter lays it out, lays it out
5 accurately, including the fact that Ms. Trzaskoma had that
6 initial thought that it was one and the same.
7 Q. Are you referring to the "Jesus, I do think that it's her"
8 email?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. You met with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein prior to this
11 hearing, correct?
12 A. We worked together. I've certainly talked with her on many
13 occasions about the issues that are before the judge in this
14 hearing. I'm testifying from my own best recollection, but
15 I've certainly talked with them about the issues.
16 Q. How many times did you meet with them to discuss this
17 hearing?
18 A. Never. What I'm saying is I've talked about the issues
19 with them. We worked very hard on the July 21st letter to try
20 to get it accurate, but we did not meet in preparation for this
21 hearing.
22 Q. So, you didn't discuss what your answers would be?
23 A. I think that they know what my recollection is, and I think
24 I know what their recollection is, because we worked so hard on
25 the letter to reconstruct what had happened.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010047
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document