Event Details

This document appears to be a page from an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00332-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on July 6, 2020. It quotes specific portions of prior testimony (likely a deposition) where the defendant denies knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual activities with others and explicitly denies ever giving massages to anyone, including Epstein or '[Minor Victim-2].' The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss, citing Title 18, Section 1623 (False Declarations before a Grand Jury/Court).

This document is page 11 of a court filing (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ) dated July 2, 2020, detailing statutory allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein conspired to violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422, by enticing and coercing individuals to travel in interstate commerce for illegal sexual activity.

This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for the detention of a female defendant (identified by context as Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecution argues she is a significant flight risk due to her wealth, multiple citizenships (US, UK, France), and possession of three passports. It notes she has taken at least 15 international flights in the last three years to locations including the UK, Japan, and Qatar.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Judge regarding the trial schedule, specifically concerns about the jury having enough time to deliberate before the upcoming holiday season (referencing 'the 27th'). The defense argues against rushing the jury, while the Judge admonishes that closing arguments cannot be delayed until after the holiday.

This is a page from a court transcript (Exhibit A-5764) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The testimony centers on the preparation of a 'July 21st letter' and whether the witness met with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein to prepare for the current hearing. Brune denies meeting for hearing preparation but acknowledges they worked closely to reconstruct events for the letter, specifically referencing an email with the text 'Jesus, I do think that it's her'.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar or discussion between the Judge, defense attorney Ms. Menninger, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding '3500 material' (discovery) received on October 11th. The conversation focuses on the scope of testimony concerning a person named 'Kelly,' alleged involvement in massages, and the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane'.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on 'Exhibit 3,' a scientific study accepted in May 2020, specifically discussing the lack of a universally accepted model for defining behaviors that constitute 'sexual grooming' in child sexual abuse cases. The witness clarifies that this study is just one example of the literature informing their opinion.

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Maxwell). It features the cross-examination of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Dr. Rocchio's definition of a 'child' (age of consent vs. under 18) and references a prior interview with the government on April 9, 2021, documented in '3500 material' (Jencks Act disclosures).

This page is from a legal appeal filed on May 17, 2021, arguing for the temporary release of Ghislaine Maxwell on bond. The defense claims her constitutional rights are being violated by 'squalid' pretrial detention conditions, including sleep deprivation (lights every 15 minutes), intrusive searches, and isolation, which prevent her from effectively preparing for trial. The document references a plea by Judge McMahon and cites a separate case (US v. Tiffany Days) as precedent or context.