Extraction Summary

9
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal motion (motion to intervene)
File Size: 121 KB
Summary

This document is a 'Motion to Intervene and Supporting Memorandum of Law' filed on January 29, 2008, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-80069). Jane Doe's Mother seeks to intervene as a plaintiff in the lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, asserting she has claims sharing common questions of law and fact with the existing action. The document notes that Jane Doe's Father (a current plaintiff) does not agree to her intervention.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Defendant in Case No. 08-80069
Jane Doe No. 1 Plaintiff
Minor or protected identity; represented by parents
Jane Doe's Father Plaintiff
Parent and natural guardian; opposes the Mother's intervention
Jane Doe's Stepmother Plaintiff
Suing individually
Jane Doe's Mother Applicant/Intervenor
Seeking to intervene as a plaintiff; represented by Ricci-Leopold, P.A.
Theodore J. Leopold Attorney
Counsel for Applicant (Jane Doe's Mother); Ricci-Leopold, P.A.
Jeffrey M. Herman Attorney
Recipient of service; likely opposing counsel or co-plaintiff counsel
Stuart S. Mermelstein Attorney
Recipient of service
Adam D. Horowitz Attorney
Recipient of service

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Venue of the lawsuit
Ricci-Leopold, P.A.
Representing the Applicant (Jane Doe's Mother)

Timeline (1 events)

2008-01-29
Motion to Intervene filed with the US District Court Southern District of Florida
Southern District of Florida

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction
Address of Ricci-Leopold, P.A.

Relationships (3)

Jane Doe's Mother Parent/Guardian Jane Doe No. 1
Applicant, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1
Jane Doe's Father Parent/Guardian Jane Doe No. 1
JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian
Jane Doe's Mother Adversarial (Legal) Jane Doe's Father
Counsel for JANE DOE'S FATHER, who do not agree to her intervention in this action.

Key Quotes (3)

"Counsel for Applicant conferred with Counsel for JANE DOE'S FATHER, who do not agree to her intervention in this action."
Source
005.pdf
Quote #1
"Applicant, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, is the parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1."
Source
005.pdf
Quote #2
"Applicant has claims for the same causes of action as JANE DOE'S FATHER."
Source
005.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,121 characters)

Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO.1, by and through
JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural
guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and
JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
______________________/
MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Applicant, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of
JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through the undersigned counsel, moves this Court, pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b), for leave to intervene as a plaintiff in this action in order
to assert the claims against Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN set forth in Applicant's proposed
complaint (attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A''). In support of this motion, Applicant states that:
1. Applicant has claims that share common questions of law or fact with the main action.
2. Applicant's motion to intervene is timely.
3. The original parties to this action will not be prejudiced by the intervention of Applicant.
4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.A.3, counsel for Applicant, in a good faith attempt to resolve
this dispute, made a reasonable effort to confer with all parties who may be affected by
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
her intervention in this action. Counsel for Applicant conferred with Counsel for JANE
DOE'S FATHER, who do not agree to her intervention in this action.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(l)(B), "[o]n timely motion, the court may
permit anyone to intervene who . . . has a claim or defense that shares with the main action a
common question of law or fact." "Rule 24(b) should be liberally construed. 'Basically, anyone
may be permitted to intervene if his claim and the main action have a common question of law or
fact,' unless the court in its 'sound discretion (determines that) the intervention will unduly delay
or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties."' Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish
School Bd., 298 F. Supp. 288, 292-93 (D.C. La. 1969) (quoting Allen v. County School Board of
Prince Edward County, 28 F.R.D. 358, 363 (E.D. Va. 1961)) (citation and footnote omitted).
Applicant, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, is the parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE
NO. 1. As demonstrated in the attached proposed complaint, Applicant has claims for the same
causes of action as JANE DOE'S FATHER. Therefore, her claims share common questions of
law and fact with the main action. Applicant's motion to intervene is timely because it has been
filed within days of the filing of the initial complaint in this action. And, because this action has
just been initiated, permitting Applicant to intervene at this stage will not unduly delay the
proceedings or prejudice the original parties.
Page 2 of 3
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
WHEREFORE, Applicant, JANE DOE's MOTHER, respectfully requests the Court
grant her motion to intervene and accept the attached proposed Intervenor's Complaint as filed.
Dated: January 29th, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
RICCI~LEOPOLD, P.A.
2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Phone: 561-684-6500
Fax: 561-697-2383
By: /s/Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
Florida Bar No. 705608
tleopold@riccilaw.com
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed electronically
on January 29th , 2008 with the Clerk of the Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice
of the electronic filing to the following: Jeffrey M. Herman, jherman@hermanlaw.com; Stuart S.
Mermelstein, smermelstein@hermanlaw.com; Adam D. Horowitz,
ahorowitz@hennanlaw.com.
/s/Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD, ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 705608
RICCI~LEOPOLD, P.A.
2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
Palm Beach Gardens FL 33410
Phone: 561-684-6500;
Fax: 561-515-2610
Email: tleopold@riccilaw.com
Page 3 of 3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document