Jane Doe's Stepmother
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 1
|
Family |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of Jane Doe, her father, and stepmother against Jeffrey... | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Legal filing | A legal complaint was filed against Jeffrey Epstein by Jane Doe and her parents, alleging Intenti... | N/A | View |
| 2008-02-22 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (DE 9) | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-02-14 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs' Notice of Non-Opposition to Motion to Intervene filed by Jane Doe's Mother. | United States District Cour... | View |
010.pdf
This is a Final Order of Dismissal from the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated February 28, 2008. The case (08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON) involves Jane Doe No. 1 and family members as Plaintiffs against Jeffrey Epstein as Defendant. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case without prejudice and denied all pending motions as moot following the Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal.
009.pdf
This document is a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed on February 22, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-80069). The plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 1 and her parents) voluntarily dismissed their action against Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes a certificate of service indicating that notice was sent electronically to attorney Theodore Jon Leopold and by mail to Jeffrey Epstein at his New York residence.
008.pdf
This document is a Notice of Non-Opposition filed on February 14, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe No. 1 et al. v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 1, her father, and stepmother) inform the court that they do not oppose the motion to intervene filed by Jane Doe's mother. The document lists the attorneys representing the plaintiffs from the firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
007.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on February 13, 2008, by the attorneys for Jane Doe No. 1 and her father in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 08-80069). The plaintiffs oppose a motion filed by Jane Doe's mother, Dawn LaVogue Sandberg, who sought to stay the proceedings until the minor plaintiff reached the age of majority. The plaintiffs argue that the mother's motion is procedurally defective, was not properly served on the defendant (Epstein), and that the mother lacks standing because the father has full legal custody of the child. The document emphasizes that the lawsuit concerns the sexual assault of Jane Doe No. 1 by Epstein when she was 14 years old.
005.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Intervene and Supporting Memorandum of Law' filed on January 29, 2008, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-80069). Jane Doe's Mother seeks to intervene as a plaintiff in the lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, asserting she has claims sharing common questions of law and fact with the existing action. The document notes that Jane Doe's Father (a current plaintiff) does not agree to her intervention.
004.pdf
This is a Motion to Stay Proceedings filed on January 29, 2008, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Jane Doe's Mother (Intervenor-Plaintiff) requests the court pause the lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein until Jane Doe No. 1 turns 18 on May 13, 2008. The motion reveals that Jane Doe No. 1 is estranged from her father (who filed the suit) and that the father filed the suit without her knowledge or consent.
003.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 1 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 08-80069-CIV-MARRA). Dated January 28, 2008, Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders counsel to confer and file a joint scheduling and discovery report. It outlines procedural deadlines for pretrial discovery and scheduling conferences pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DOJ-OGR-00030437.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 26, 2017. It outlines two counts: Count II, 'Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress,' brought by plaintiff Jane Doe and her parents (Father and Stepmother), and Count III, 'Loss of Parental Consortium,' brought by Jane Doe's Father. The plaintiffs allege Epstein's conduct was intentional and outrageous, causing severe emotional distress and damages for which they seek compensatory and punitive relief.
DOJ-OGR-00030433.jpg
This is the first page of a civil complaint filed on January 24, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-80069). The plaintiffs are a minor identified as Jane Doe No. 1, along with her father and stepmother, filing against Jeffrey Epstein. The complaint alleges sexual assault and abuse, noting that fictitious names are used to protect the minor's identity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021525.jpg
This document is a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated February 27, 2008, reporting that a girl (Jane Doe) dropped her lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager, due to squabbling between her divorced parents. The article details allegations of sexual activity with Jane Doe when she was 14, other accusations against Epstein, and the legal history of the involved parties, including Epstein's 2006 indictment for felony solicitation of prostitution and the father's 2001 federal fraud conviction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021521.jpg
This document is an FBI FD-350 form containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated January 25, 2008. The article reports on a federal lawsuit filed by attorney Jeffrey Herman on behalf of a 14-year-old girl ('Jane Doe') and her parents against Jeffrey Epstein, seeking over $50 million for alleged sexual assault in 2005. The article details the allegations, including Epstein's preference for minors, and describes a counter-strategy by Epstein's legal team (Goldberger, Sanchez, Lefcourt) to discredit the plaintiffs by highlighting the parents' criminal history and alleging financial motivation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity