DOJ-OGR-00014699.jpg
621 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size:
621 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Mr. Everdell and Ms. Moe argue before the judge regarding a question posed by the jury about 'Count Four,' specifically whether a return flight from New Mexico involving a victim named 'Jane' constitutes aiding in illegal sexual activity if the initial flight to New Mexico did not. The defense argues the return flight cannot be the sole basis for conviction, while the prosecution argues intent can be inferred.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the interpretation of a jury question concerning flights and Count Four.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor |
Arguing that the jury could infer intent regarding the return flight.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness (Pseudonym) |
Subject of the transportation/flights to and from New Mexico.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell (based on case number); accused of aiding in transportation.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the attorneys.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10 (Filing Date)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where 'Jane' flew to and where alleged conduct may have occurred.
|
Relationships (1)
Discussion of defendant aiding in Jane's transportation.
Key Quotes (4)
"If the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014699.jpg
Quote #1
"The only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014699.jpg
Quote #2
"Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose of illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014699.jpg
Quote #3
"Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and abetting that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014699.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,598 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 29 3130
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 question because they haven't identified a flight here.
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think they've been fairly
3 clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation
4 of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The
5 only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is
6 the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico.
7 And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the
8 flight to New Mexico.
9 She is also alleged that -- and to be honest, I think
10 it was a little unclear what may have happened in New Mexico
11 based on her testimony; but if there was any illegal sexual
12 conduct, the flight to New Mexico, this is what they are
13 debating, because they say, but not the flight to New Mexico,
14 where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
15 Okay. So it seems that the jury is deliberating or at
16 least trying to decide whether the flight to New Mexico was for
17 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity. And they
18 are confused that the return flight that happens after that,
19 could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four.
20 Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose
21 of illegal sexual activity.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to
23 this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage
24 in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and
25 abetting that.
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think they've been fairly
3 clear. They say: If the defendant aided in the transportation
4 of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico. The
5 only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is
6 the one in the flight logs, and it is a flight to New Mexico.
7 And so the return flight would be some other flight besides the
8 flight to New Mexico.
9 She is also alleged that -- and to be honest, I think
10 it was a little unclear what may have happened in New Mexico
11 based on her testimony; but if there was any illegal sexual
12 conduct, the flight to New Mexico, this is what they are
13 debating, because they say, but not the flight to New Mexico,
14 where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
15 Okay. So it seems that the jury is deliberating or at
16 least trying to decide whether the flight to New Mexico was for
17 the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity. And they
18 are confused that the return flight that happens after that,
19 could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four.
20 Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose
21 of illegal sexual activity.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, at the very least, the answer to
23 this can't be no, because a jury could infer intent to engage
24 in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and
25 abetting that.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014699
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document