Event Details

August 10, 2022

Description

Court Proceedings/Jury Deliberation arguments

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Ms. Moe person 1588 View Entity
Judge person 227 View Entity
Mr. Everdell person 1327 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00014699.jpg

Court Transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) • 621 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Mr. Everdell and Ms. Moe argue before the judge regarding a question posed by the jury about 'Count Four,' specifically whether a return flight from New Mexico involving a victim named 'Jane' constitutes aiding in illegal sexual activity if the initial flight to New Mexico did not. The defense argues the return flight cannot be the sole basis for conviction, while the prosecution argues intent can be inferred.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.

2022-08-10

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.

2022-08-10

View

Direct examination of witness Hesse regarding message taking procedures.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Jury Deliberation/Instruction

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

Submission of Government Exhibits (1A, 1B, 1C, 1J, 1K, 1M, 10, 1P, 3A, 3B) into evidence.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

A discussion in court regarding the procedure for presenting exhibits to the jury during a trial.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)

View

A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.

Date unknown

View

The conclusion of a cross-examination of witness Dr. Dubin by Ms. Moe, an objection by Mr. Pagliuca, and the witness being excused by the court.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)

View

A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Southern District Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:44

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00014699.jpg
Date String
2022-08-10 (Filing Date)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event