This document is a page from the closing arguments (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that a witness named Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in sworn testimony or depositions 12 years prior (2009), nor did message pads show calls to Maxwell from Carolyn, only to Epstein. The defense uses this inconsistency to attack the credibility of the witness's current testimony connecting Maxwell to the abuse.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Speaker delivering the summation argument.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the trial; defense argues she was not mentioned in the accuser's early testimony.
|
| Carolyn | Witness/Accuser |
The 'she' referred to in the text (identified by name in line 23); accuser who gave deposition in 2009.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate |
Mentioned regarding the 'Epstein home' and as the recipient of phone calls.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution; mentioned as having seized message pads.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the 'operation' mentioned in line 10.
|
|
|
Where the jury will review evidence.
|
"Twelve years ago she was asked under oath to answer questions about who was involved in the trafficking of her or the sexual abuse of her... she didn't say anything about Ghislaine Maxwell."Source
"Not one mention of Ghislaine Maxwell in hours of deposition testimony back in 2009."Source
"And you will see there's not one single message for Ghislaine Maxwell having to do with Carolyn. She's calling for Epstein."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,569 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document