DOJ-OGR-00020529.jpg

1.39 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket sheet / case log
File Size: 1.39 MB
Summary

This document is a page from the court docket (entries 302-308) covering June 16 to July 1, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence obtained via grand jury subpoena and ordering the unsealing of documents related to the civil case *Giuffre v. Maxwell*. The judge also granted a request regarding the reporting of Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC, limiting government updates only to material changes.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court orders and letters; motions to suppress evidence denied.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge issuing orders and signing documents.
Maurene Comey Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)
Prosecutor sending letters to the judge.
Alison Moe Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)
Prosecutor sending letters to the judge.
Lara Pomerantz Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)
Prosecutor sending letters to the judge; listed as filer.
Andrew Rohrbach Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)
Prosecutor sending letters to the judge.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USA
Plaintiff/Government (United States of America)
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center (referenced regarding confinement conditions)
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals (referenced in case citation)

Timeline (3 events)

2021-06-25
Judge Nathan denies Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) via Order 303 and Opinion 307.
Court
2021-06-25
Judge grants Maxwell's request regarding updates on confinement conditions; Government only to file if material changes occur (Order 304).
Court
2021-07-01
Court lifts temporary seal on June 25 Opinion and orders unsealing of documents related to Giuffre v. Maxwell protective order modification (Order 308).
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
MDC
Detention center where Maxwell is held

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant / Judge Alison J. Nathan
Orders issued by Judge Nathan regarding Maxwell's motions and confinement.
Maurene Comey Prosecutor / Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell
AUSA filing letters 'by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell'.

Key Quotes (5)

"Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020529.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court grants the Defendant's request that going forward the Government shall only file updates if there are any material changes to Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020529.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court finds that the Government did not violate Maxwell's constitutional rights when it obtained evidence covered by a protective order in her earlier civil case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020529.jpg
Quote #3
"Maxwell is not entitled to suppression of any evidence or to an evidentiary hearing."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020529.jpg
Quote #4
"Thus, the Court lifts the temporary seal on its June 25, 2021 opinion on Maxwells motions to suppress."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020529.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,847 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page43 of 92
| | | Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 06/16/2021)
06/16/2021 | 302 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 7, 2021 re: MDC Conditions Update Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/16/2021)
06/25/2021 | 303 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days. The Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were previously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts. Any proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit's opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jbo) (Entered: 06/25/2021)
06/25/2021 | 304 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court grants the Defendant's request that going forward the Government shall only file updates if there are any material changes to Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement. See Dkt. No. 300 at 1. In the absence of any other specific or supported application for relief from the Defendant, the Court will take no further action at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/25/2021)
06/25/2021 | 307 | OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell moves to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to a law firm involved in earlier civil litigation against her. She contends that because the documents sought by the subpoena were previously subject to a protective order, the Government obtained them in violation of her rights against compelled self-incrimination, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and to due process of law. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Government did not violate Maxwell's constitutional rights when it obtained evidence covered by a protective order in her earlier civil case. It further finds that Maxwell is not entitled to suppression of any evidence or to an evidentiary hearing. The Court thus DENIES Maxwell's motions to suppress (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jw) (Entered: 07/01/2021)
06/30/2021 | 305 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Pursuant to the Court's order of June 25, 2021 (Dkt. No. 303), any proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence must be filed no later than today, June 30, 2021. Any proposed redactions to the other documents ordered unsealed in that order must be filed no later than July 2, 2021. The parties shall file a joint letter by each of these dates informing the Court if no redactions are sought. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/30/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 06/30/2021)
06/30/2021 | 306 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 30, 2021 re: Joint Letter re June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order and Defense Exhibits Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/30/2021)
07/01/2021 | 308 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. No party has proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence or the documents ordered unsealed in the Courts June 25, 2021 Order (Dkt. No. 303). Thus, the Court lifts the temporary seal on its June 25, 2021 opinion on Maxwells motions to suppress. It also unseals the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Governments application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application, originally filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Maxwell shall
DOJ-OGR-00020529

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document