DOJ-OGR-00016624.jpg

600 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 600 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Menninger, Comey, and Pagliuca discuss scheduling and stipulations regarding 'prior inconsistent statements' found in FBI 302 reports for witnesses identified as Carolyn, Jane, and Annie. The court focuses on resolving issues related to 'Carolyn' immediately as she is an out-of-state witness present to testify that afternoon.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Ms. Menninger Defense Attorney
Addressing the court regarding witness scheduling and prior inconsistent statements.
Ms. Comey Prosecutor (Government)
Confirming the agreement with the defense regarding witness Carolyn.
Mr. Pagliuca Attorney
Providing transcript citations for agreed-upon statements.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the afternoon session.
Carolyn Witness
Witness from out of state, scheduled to testify that afternoon; subject of discussion regarding prior inconsistent st...
Jane Witness
Witness discussed regarding prior inconsistent statements; testimony likely deferred.
Annie Witness
Witness discussed regarding prior inconsistent statements; testimony likely deferred.
Loftus Witness (Expert)
Mentioned in the header 'Loftus - direct', likely referring to Elizabeth Loftus.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The Government
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated in footer stamp)

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Afternoon Court Session
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by case number and court reporter location.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Menninger Opposing Counsel Ms. Comey
Discussing joint proposals and lack of agreement on stipulations.
Carolyn Co-Witnesses/Victims Jane
Grouped together in legal arguments regarding 'prior inconsistent statements'.

Key Quotes (2)

"The one that pertains to Carolyn is here from out of state and would be testifying this afternoon."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016624.jpg
Quote #1
"Those correspond to the following statements in the 302."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016624.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,527 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 141 of 246 2436
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
1 AFTERNOON SESSION
2 2:05 p.m.
3 THE COURT: Okay, where are we?
4 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, the government and I spoke
5 over the break. We appreciate how lengthy two of the witness's
6 prior inconsistent statement contentions are. We were unable,
7 in this amount of time, to try to reach agreement on all of
8 them. The witnesses that pertain to those two would be
9 testifying tomorrow. The one that pertains to Carolyn is here
10 from out of state and would be testifying this afternoon. So
11 our joint proposal, I think, would be to address right now the
12 Carolyn prior inconsistent statement so that witness could
13 testify or be released this afternoon and then, at the close of
14 court this afternoon, for us to sit down with the testimony and
15 try to reach agreement on the two related to Jane and Annie.
16 MS. COMEY: That's correct, your Honor. I believe
17 there are only three statements at this point in dispute
18 regarding Carolyn, so I think we can resolve that pretty
19 quickly. Mr. Pagliuca, I believe, has the list of the three
20 that I believe are in dispute.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, your Honor. The two that are
22 agreed to are at transcript 3610, 9 through 15 -- I'm sorry.
23 Not 36. I have 35 numbers in my head. 1610, lines 9 through
24 15; 1611, lines 1 through 5. Those correspond to the following
25 statements in the 302.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016624

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document