Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
Afternoon Court Session
Participants (8)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | person | 906 | View Entity |
| Juan Patricio Alessi | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
| Ms. Comey | person | 1419 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
Source Documents (5)
DOJ-OGR-00017986.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the afternoon session of a trial on August 10, 2022. It details the resumption of the direct examination of witness Juan Patricio Alessi by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on Government Exhibit 298, specifically identifying a room labeled 'foyer' using a touch screen.
DOJ-OGR-00016624.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Menninger, Comey, and Pagliuca discuss scheduling and stipulations regarding 'prior inconsistent statements' found in FBI 302 reports for witnesses identified as Carolyn, Jane, and Annie. The court focuses on resolving issues related to 'Carolyn' immediately as she is an out-of-state witness present to testify that afternoon.
DOJ-OGR-00014000.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Menninger, Comey, and Pagliuca are discussing procedural matters with the Judge regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements for a witness named 'Carolyn' (who is present from out of state) and future discussions regarding witnesses 'Jane' and 'Annie'. The attorneys reference specific transcript lines (1610 and 1611) and an FBI 302 report.
DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00018752.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details an afternoon session where the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and defense (Ms. Menninger) discuss the late discovery of text messages involving 'Jane' and her brother. As a result, the parties agree to delay the testimony of a witness named Brian until the following morning to allow time to review the new evidence.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event