DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg
625 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
File Size:
625 KB
Summary
This page from a court transcript (case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details sentencing proceedings for Ms. Maxwell. The Judge rejects the claim that Maxwell is indigent, citing $22 million in assets reported in 2020 and a lack of documentation regarding her marriage/divorce, and states an intention to impose a fine. The Judge also notes the government is not seeking restitution, finds no grounds for downward departures from sentencing guidelines, and calls for a lunch break.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the sentencing hearing; judge discusses her assets, marriage, and upcoming sentence.
|
| The Court / Judge | Presiding Official |
Speaker (implied via 'I'); ruling on fines, restitution, and sentencing guidelines.
|
| The Defense | Legal Team |
Failed to provide documentation regarding Maxwell's marriage or divorce.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Noted by the judge as not seeking restitution.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by 'DOJ-OGR' stamp in footer.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-07-22
Sentencing Hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number format and reporter name.
|
Relationships (1)
Judge mentions 'defense has not provided documentation of her marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement.'
Key Quotes (4)
"The claim now of an inability to pay the fine... at the same time in which the defense has not provided documentation of her marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg
Quote #1
"So I am unpersuaded based on the balance of facts that the defendant is indigent, and I do intend to impose a fine."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg
Quote #2
"I understand the government is not seeking restitution."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg
Quote #3
"I've considered whether there's an appropriate basis for departure from the advisory range within the Guideline system and do not find any grounds warranting departure under the Guidelines."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,602 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 54 of 101 54
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 assets, and then reported $22 million in assets in support of
2 the December 2020 bail application. The claim now of an
3 inability to pay the fine, as I understand it, at the same time
4 in which the defense has not provided documentation of her
5 marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement. So I am
6 unpersuaded based on the balance of facts that the defendant is
7 indigent, and I do intend to impose a fine.
8 I will address restitution at the end. I understand
9 the government is not seeking restitution. So we will pick
10 that up at the end.
11 All right. With that, I'm going to take a break, and
12 then I will come back and hear from -- just fill a few
13 formalities. Neither of the papers make an argument for formal
14 downward departures, as I understood them. In any event, I've
15 considered whether there's an appropriate basis for departure
16 from the advisory range within the Guideline system and do not
17 find any grounds warranting departure under the Guidelines.
18 When we return with the Guideline calculation
19 complete, I will hear from the parties as to what they contend
20 a reasonable sentence is for Ms. Maxwell, taking into account
21 the 3553(a) factors.
22 It's 12:30, which is a shocking fact to me. I suppose
23 we should take a 30-minute break so that everyone can get
24 lunch, as I imagine we still have a fair amount of matters to
25 discuss and time to get through. So we'll take a 30-minute
2 the December 2020 bail application. The claim now of an
3 inability to pay the fine, as I understand it, at the same time
4 in which the defense has not provided documentation of her
5 marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement. So I am
6 unpersuaded based on the balance of facts that the defendant is
7 indigent, and I do intend to impose a fine.
8 I will address restitution at the end. I understand
9 the government is not seeking restitution. So we will pick
10 that up at the end.
11 All right. With that, I'm going to take a break, and
12 then I will come back and hear from -- just fill a few
13 formalities. Neither of the papers make an argument for formal
14 downward departures, as I understood them. In any event, I've
15 considered whether there's an appropriate basis for departure
16 from the advisory range within the Guideline system and do not
17 find any grounds warranting departure under the Guidelines.
18 When we return with the Guideline calculation
19 complete, I will hear from the parties as to what they contend
20 a reasonable sentence is for Ms. Maxwell, taking into account
21 the 3553(a) factors.
22 It's 12:30, which is a shocking fact to me. I suppose
23 we should take a 30-minute break so that everyone can get
24 lunch, as I imagine we still have a fair amount of matters to
25 discuss and time to get through. So we'll take a 30-minute
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. .
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011573
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011573
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document