July 22, 2022
Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge | person | 227 | View Entity |
| government counsel | person | 14 | View Entity |
| Lara Pomerantz | person | 855 | View Entity |
| Judge Alison J. Nathan | person | 50 | View Entity |
| Bobbi Sternheim | person | 300 | View Entity |
| Ms. Sternheim | person | 877 | View Entity |
| MAURENE COMEY | person | 976 | View Entity |
| ANDREW ROHRBACH | person | 698 | View Entity |
| Alison Moe | person | 1004 | View Entity |
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| CHRISTIAN EVERDELL | person | 625 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
| Judge Nathan | person | 619 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021626.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) involving the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is excessive and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim compares Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that Epstein was 'far more culpable' yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg
This page from a court transcript (case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details sentencing proceedings for Ms. Maxwell. The Judge rejects the claim that Maxwell is indigent, citing $22 million in assets reported in 2020 and a lack of documentation regarding her marriage/divorce, and states an intention to impose a fine. The Judge also notes the government is not seeking restitution, finds no grounds for downward departures from sentencing guidelines, and calls for a lunch break.
DOJ-OGR-00011608.jpg
This document is page 89 of a sentencing transcript filed on July 22, 2022, involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The presiding judge explains that Maxwell is being sentenced specifically for her own role in enticing, transporting, and trafficking underage girls (some as young as 14) for sexual abuse by and with Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing that she is not being punished merely as a proxy for Epstein but for her own direct participation in the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00010727.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 26, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is responding to a court order concerning an application by Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to speak at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter references a previous order where the Court declined to allow individuals not proven at trial to be directly harmed to speak at the hearing, instead permitting them to submit written statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020476.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 covering the sentencing phase of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, and 'Kate') to provide impact statements, notes Giuffre's medical inability to attend in person, records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, and grants a motion by the NY Times to unseal juror questionnaires.
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA regarding Discovery Disclosure and Access.
2020-08-13 • District of New York
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event