Event Details

July 22, 2022

Description

Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell

Participants (16)

Name Type Mentions
Judge person 227 View Entity
government counsel person 14 View Entity
Lara Pomerantz person 855 View Entity
Judge Alison J. Nathan person 50 View Entity
Bobbi Sternheim person 300 View Entity
Ms. Sternheim person 877 View Entity
MAURENE COMEY person 976 View Entity
ANDREW ROHRBACH person 698 View Entity
Alison Moe person 1004 View Entity
GOVERNMENT organization 2805 View Entity
The Court organization 2003 View Entity
Ms. Maxwell person 1982 View Entity
Defense counsel person 578 View Entity
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL person 625 View Entity
GHISLAINE MAXWELL person 9575 View Entity
Judge Nathan person 619 View Entity

Source Documents (5)

DOJ-OGR-00021626.jpg

Court Transcript (Sentencing Hearing) • 533 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) involving the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is excessive and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim compares Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that Epstein was 'far more culpable' yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.

DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg

Court Transcript (Sentencing Hearing) • 625 KB
View

This page from a court transcript (case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details sentencing proceedings for Ms. Maxwell. The Judge rejects the claim that Maxwell is indigent, citing $22 million in assets reported in 2020 and a lack of documentation regarding her marriage/divorce, and states an intention to impose a fine. The Judge also notes the government is not seeking restitution, finds no grounds for downward departures from sentencing guidelines, and calls for a lunch break.

DOJ-OGR-00011608.jpg

Court Transcript (Sentencing Hearing) • 638 KB
View

This document is page 89 of a sentencing transcript filed on July 22, 2022, involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The presiding judge explains that Maxwell is being sentenced specifically for her own role in enticing, transporting, and trafficking underage girls (some as young as 14) for sexual abuse by and with Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing that she is not being punished merely as a proxy for Epstein but for her own direct participation in the abuse.

DOJ-OGR-00010727.jpg

Legal Correspondence / Court Filing • 477 KB
View

This document is a letter filed on June 26, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is responding to a court order concerning an application by Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to speak at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter references a previous order where the Court declined to allow individuals not proven at trial to be directly harmed to speak at the hearing, instead permitting them to submit written statements.

DOJ-OGR-00020476.jpg

Court Docket Sheet • 1.41 MB
View

This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 covering the sentencing phase of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, and 'Kate') to provide impact statements, notes Giuffre's medical inability to attend in person, records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, and grants a motion by the NY Times to unseal juror questionnaires.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell

2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals

View

LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA regarding Discovery Disclosure and Access.

2020-08-13 • District of New York

View

A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.

Date unknown

View

The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.

2022-08-10

View

LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.

2020-07-29

View

Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.

2021-02-16 • MDC

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.

Date unknown • prison/jail

View

Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail

2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)

View

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Courtroom (Southern District)
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
16
Source Documents
5
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:26

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021626.jpg
Date String
Unspecified in text (Document filed 06/29/2023)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event