Extraction Summary

27
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order
File Size: 75.3 KB
Summary

A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry v. James Dimon, et al. (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Judge Jed S. Rakoff granted the motion for attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. to appear *pro hac vice* as counsel for the plaintiff. The lawsuit names numerous JPMorgan executives, including James Dimon and James E. Staley, as defendants.

People (27)

Name Role Context
Michael J. Barry Applicant/Attorney
Attorney granted admission pro hac vice to represent the plaintiff
Jed S. Rakoff Judge
United States District Judge who signed the order
James Dimon Defendant
Listed as defendant in the case caption
James E. Staley Defendant
Listed as defendant in the case caption (Jes Staley)
Ashley Bacon Defendant
Listed as defendant
Linda B. Bammann Defendant
Listed as defendant
James A. Bell Defendant
Listed as defendant
John H. Biggs Defendant
Listed as defendant
Crandall C. Bowles Defendant
Listed as defendant
Stephen B. Burke Defendant
Listed as defendant
Todd A. Combs Defendant
Listed as defendant
David M. Cote Defendant
Listed as defendant
James S. Crown Defendant
Listed as defendant
Mary C. Erdoes Defendant
Listed as defendant
Timothy P. Flynn Defendant
Listed as defendant
Ellen V. Futter Defendant
Listed as defendant
Mellody Hobson Defendant
Listed as defendant
John J. Hogan Defendant
Listed as defendant
Laban P. Jackson, Jr. Defendant
Listed as defendant
John W. Kessler Defendant
Listed as defendant
Robert I. Lipp Defendant
Listed as defendant
Richard A. Manoogian Defendant
Listed as defendant
Michael A. Neal Defendant
Listed as defendant
David C. Novak Defendant
Listed as defendant
Lee R. Raymond Defendant
Listed as defendant
William C. Weldon Defendant
Listed as defendant
Barry L. Zubrow Defendant
Listed as defendant

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund
Plaintiff in the lawsuit against JPMorgan directors
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Company involved in the derivative suit
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
Firm representing the plaintiff (Michael J. Barry)
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Court where the case is filed

Timeline (1 events)

2023-06-09
Order signed granting admission pro hac vice to Michael J. Barry
New York, NY

Locations (4)

Location Context
Location of the court and where the order was signed
Address of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
Bar membership location for Michael J. Barry
Bar membership location for Michael J. Barry

Relationships (2)

Applicant having requested admission pro hac vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for plaintiff
James E. Staley Defendant/Former Executive JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Listed as Defendant in suit involving JPMorgan Chase

Key Quotes (1)

"The motion of Michael J. Barry for admission to practice pro hac vice in the above-captioned action is GRANTED."
Source
008.pdf
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,978 characters)

Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR Document 8 Filed 06/09/23 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR Document 6-3 Filed 06/06/23 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
OPERATING ENGINEERS
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND
MISCELLANEOUS PENSION FUND,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES DIMON, ASHLEY BACON,
LINDA B. BAMMANN, JAMES A. BELL,
JOHN H. BIGGS, CRANDALL C.
BOWLES, STEPHEN B. BURKE, TODD A.
COMBS, DAVID M. COTE, JAMES S.
CROWN, MARY C. ERDOES, TIMOTHY
P. FLYNN, ELLEN V. FUTTER,
MELLODY HOBSON, JOHN J. HOGAN,
LABAN P. JACKSON, JR., JOHN W.
KESSLER, ROBERT I. LIPP, RICHARD A.
MANOOGIAN, MICHAEL A. NEAL,
DAVID C. NOVAK, LEE R. RAYMOND,
JAMES E. STALEY, WILLIAM C.
WELDON, and BARRY L. ZUBROW,
Defendants,
and
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
Nominal Defendant.
C.A. No. 1:23-cv-03903-JSR
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
The motion of Michael J. Barry for admission to practice pro hac vice in the above-captioned action is GRANTED.
Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the bars Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey, and that his contact information is as follows:
GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
123 Justison St.
Wilmington DE 19801
Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR Document 8 Filed 06/09/23 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR Document 6-3 Filed 06/06/23 Page 2 of 2
mbarry@gelaw.com
(302) 622-7000
Applicant having requested admission pro hac vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for plaintiff Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund in the above-captioned action,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice pro hac vice in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.
Dated: June 9, 2023
New York, NY
Jed S. Rakoff
The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff
United States District Judge
2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document