New York, NY
LocationRelationship Network
Jeffrey Epstein Part 02 of 08.pdf
This document collection details the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for child prostitution between late 2006 and early 2007. It includes internal FBI communications requesting travel to interview witnesses in New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, and the US Virgin Islands, as well as indications of coordination with the Palm Beach Police Department. The file also contains financial request forms for investigative expenses and notes the creation of link analysis charts (i2 Analyst Notebook) to track the case data.
Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.25 (Redacted).pdf
This document is a transcript of a proffer interview with Ghislaine Maxwell conducted by the DOJ and FBI on July 25, 2025. Maxwell discusses her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, denies participating in or witnessing sexual abuse of minors, and details her interactions with high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Elon Musk. She addresses financial transactions, flight logs, and specific allegations regarding recruitment of women for Epstein.
Epstein_Part_04_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains Sarah Kellen's cellphone usage records from September to October 2005, detailing calls made to and from various individuals including Jeffrey Epstein, Johanna Sjoberg, and a pilot named David Rodgers, with a note referencing a 'discovery of investigation & preparations to come to Palm Beach'. It also includes subscriber information for Sarah Kellen's Cingular Wireless account, showing Jeffrey Epstein as the financially liable party and their shared New York address.
Epstein_Part_02.pdf
This document contains a collection of FBI internal memos, electronic communications, and administrative forms related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein under Case ID 31E-MM-108062, covering late 2006 to early 2007. The files detail requests for travel concurrence to interview witnesses in various locations, the assignment of agents, the creation of analyst charts, and financial requests for expenses and search fees. A significant portion of the document consists of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing hundreds of pages withheld under FOIA exemptions.
076.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on December 8, 2020, in the U.S. District Court (SDNY). The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, along with associated entities) agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice because the plaintiff resolved her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order was signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
004.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is requesting permission to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The defendants include Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as representatives of the estate, as well as Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC.
049.pdf
This document is a legal filing from March 10, 2021, in the case of USA v. Michael Thomas (one of the guards charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death). Defense attorney Montell Figgins requests court permission for Thomas to travel to Georgia to visit his sick father. Judge Analisa Torres granted the request on the same day.
043.pdf
A legal motion filed on September 14, 2020, by attorney Montell Figgins on behalf of Michael Thomas, a correctional officer charged in the Epstein case (Docket 1:19-cr-00830). The document requests court permission for Thomas to travel to Georgia to visit his sick father, noting that his pre-trial services officer does not oppose the trip. Judge Analisa Torres granted the request on the same day.
042.pdf
This document is a formal request filed on September 14, 2020, by defense attorney Montell Figgins in the case USA v. Michael Thomas (related to the Jeffrey Epstein prison guard prosecution). Figgins requests court permission for his client, Michael Thomas, to travel to Georgia to visit his sick father, noting that the pre-trial services officer does not oppose the request.
039.pdf
This document is a formal request filed on September 8, 2020, by attorney Montell Figgins, representing Michael Thomas (one of the MCC guards charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death). Figgins asks Judge Analisa Torres to adjourn the trial scheduled for January 4, 2021, to May 3, 2021, citing COVID-19, personal health concerns, and the need for more time to complete his investigation. The letter is part of federal case 1:19-cr-00830.
029.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on March 20, 2020, by Montell Figgins, Esq. of The Law Offices of Montell Figgins, LLC to Honorable Analisa Torres. It requests a 14-day extension to file a motion to dismiss for their client, Defendant Michael Thomas, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, citing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their firm's operations and ability to complete the motion.
22-1426_Documents.pdf
This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.
20-3061_Documents.pdf
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
19-2221_Documents.pdf
This document contains a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding Jeffrey Epstein's appeal (19-2221) from a District Court decision (1:19-cr-490-1), dated July 23, 2019. It also includes the Notice of Appeal filed on July 22, 2019, detailing Epstein's legal representation and the pending charges of sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of children. The document lists multiple attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office representing the USA.
036.pdf
This document is a transcript of a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein held on July 15, 2019, in the SDNY. The government argued for detention based on flight risk (citing wealth, foreign ties, and a fake passport found in a safe) and danger to the community, while the defense argued for release on house arrest, citing his 14-year record of appearing for court and lack of recent convictions. Two victims, Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild, spoke in court opposing bail.
025.pdf
This document is a cover letter filed on July 17, 2019, by attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The letter submits attached documents concerning Epstein's New Mexico registration status to support his bail application, following up on a previous letter dated July 16, 2019. The filing also lists Martin G. Weinberg and Marc Allan Fernich as additional counsel.
007.pdf
This document is a motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich) requesting the court's permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that due to the high profile nature of the case and the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1)), the financial details should remain confidential to prevent them from being disseminated by the news media. The document emphasizes that the financial disclosure is intended solely for bail determination purposes.
041.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the JP Morgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation (Case No. 1:23-CV-03903), signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on November 7, 2023. The order grants attorney Christopher J. Orrico of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. admission to practice pro hac vice to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund.
038-03.pdf
This document is a proposed court order filed on August 8, 2023, in the JP Morgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation (Case 1:23-cv-03903). It grants attorney Christopher J. Orrico of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. admission pro hac vice to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, before Judge Jed S. Rakoff in the Southern District of New York.
038-02.pdf
This document contains Certificates of Good Standing for attorney Christopher John Orrico, filed as an exhibit in Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (related to US Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase regarding Epstein). The first certificate verifies his admission to the New York Bar on January 11, 2010, and his good standing as of July 13, 2023. The second certificate verifies his admission to the Connecticut Bar on November 6, 2009, and his good standing as of July 21, 2023.
037.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on August 8, 2023, in the JP Morgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation. Attorney Christopher J. Orrico of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. requests permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in the Southern District of New York. The attorney attests to his good standing in New York and Connecticut.
037-03.pdf
This document is a proposed order for the admission pro hac vice of attorney Christopher J. Orrico in the 'In re JP Morgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation'. It grants Orrico, of the firm Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in the Southern District of New York. The document provides Orrico's contact information and confirms his standing in the bars of New York and Connecticut.
030.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a motion to dismiss a derivative lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase's board regarding their oversight of Jeffrey Epstein. It alleges that the Board, including CEO Jamie Dimon, ignored red flags about Epstein's sex trafficking and financial crimes (such as massive cash withdrawals) to retain him as a client, failed to implement required BSA/AML monitoring systems, and violated a Deferred Prosecution Agreement related to Madoff. The plaintiffs argue that demand on the board is excused because a majority of directors face liability or lack independence.
024.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion to Dismiss filed on July 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:23-CV-03903) regarding the JPMorgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation. The defendants, including JPMorgan Chase, James Dimon, and various board members, are moving to dismiss the Amended Stockholder Derivative Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 12(b)(6). The defendants are represented by WilmerHale and Paul, Weiss firms.
023.pdf
This document is a 'Suggestion of Death' filed on July 6, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the JP Morgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation. The filing formally notifies the court of the death of defendant James S. Crown on June 25, 2023. It is submitted by the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, representing Crown and other defendants including Stephen B. Burke and Mellody Hobson.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity