DOJ-OGR-00013948.jpg
470 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (direct examination)
File Size:
470 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that she worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002 and confirms she never saw Maxwell pregnant nor was told she was pregnant during that time. She also confirms having a videoconference with the government regarding the case in November 2020.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Espinosa | Witness |
Former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell testifying under direct examination.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Employer |
Former employer of the witness; subject of questions regarding pregnancy.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney |
Raised an objection during the questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Overruled Ms. Pomerantz's objection.
|
| Unknown Questioner | Attorney (likely Prosecution) |
Conducting the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution/investigators who interviewed the witness.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (2 events)
1996 to 2002
Employment period of Ms. Espinosa working for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Not specified
November 2020
Videoconference between Ms. Espinosa and the government.
Videoconference
Relationships (2)
Witness testified she worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002.
Spoke via videoconference in November 2020.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,075 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 89 of 246 2384
LCGVMAX3 Espinosa - direct
LCGVMAX3 Espinosa - direct
1 videoconference with the government?
2 A. Last year, I think. So repeat your question please.
3 Q. Does that refresh your recollection of when you had this
4 videoconference for the first time with the government?
5 A. Yes, well, there's a date on here.
6 Q. And does that generally refresh your recollection about
7 when this would have happened?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Okay. And when did that happen?
10 A. November 2020.
11 Q. Okay. All right.
12 Was that the only time you spoke to the government in
13 this case?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Okay. Question about Ghislaine. In the time that you
16 worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002, did you ever
17 see Ms. Maxwell pregnant?
18 A. No.
19 Q. Ever were told that Ms. Maxwell was pregnant?
20 A. No.
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: Overruled.
23 Q. Ms. Espinosa, you said you left the job in roughly 2002; is
24 that right?
25 A. Correct.
2 A. Last year, I think. So repeat your question please.
3 Q. Does that refresh your recollection of when you had this
4 videoconference for the first time with the government?
5 A. Yes, well, there's a date on here.
6 Q. And does that generally refresh your recollection about
7 when this would have happened?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Okay. And when did that happen?
10 A. November 2020.
11 Q. Okay. All right.
12 Was that the only time you spoke to the government in
13 this case?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Okay. Question about Ghislaine. In the time that you
16 worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002, did you ever
17 see Ms. Maxwell pregnant?
18 A. No.
19 Q. Ever were told that Ms. Maxwell was pregnant?
20 A. No.
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: Overruled.
23 Q. Ms. Espinosa, you said you left the job in roughly 2002; is
24 that right?
25 A. Correct.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013948
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document