DOJ-OGR-00010463.jpg

686 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing (sentencing memorandum)
File Size: 686 KB
Summary

This document is page 17 of a sentencing memorandum filed in June 2022. It presents character statements (Exhibits F and G) from Catherine Vaughan-Edwards and Harriet Jagger, who describe Ghislaine Maxwell as a supportive friend and express sympathy for her desire for family life. The document transitions (Exhibit H) into a legal argument citing Supreme Court precedent regarding advisory sentencing guidelines.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the character references; referred to as 'Ghislaine'.
Catherine Vaughan-Edwards Character Witness
Friend, former employee, and mother of Ghislaine's godson; provided Exhibit F statement.
Harriet Jagger Character Witness
School mate from age 15; provided Exhibit G statement.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Supreme Court
Cited in legal argument regarding sentencing guidelines.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in footer code DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

A few years prior to 2022
Harriet Jagger visited Ghislaine at her home in New York where they discussed Ghislaine's desire for a family.
New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of Ghislaine's home where Harriet Jagger visited her.

Relationships (2)

Catherine Vaughan-Edwards Friend/Former Employee/Mentee Ghislaine Maxwell
Described as 'a friend, former employee, and the mother of Ghislaine’s godson'.
Harriet Jagger School Mate Ghislaine Maxwell
Described as 'a school mate from age 15'.

Key Quotes (5)

"The person that I have known for 34 years, is not the same as the Ghislaine so negatively portrayed by the press and mainstream media."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010463.jpg
Quote #1
"My own experience is that she is kind, caring and thoughtful and is always there to provide support as a loyal and generous friend."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010463.jpg
Quote #2
"The last time I saw Ghislaine was in her home in New York a few years ago."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010463.jpg
Quote #3
"I listened to her as she spoke of her wish to find the security and happiness within a family unit..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010463.jpg
Quote #4
"A NON-GUIDELINES SENTENCE WOULD BE “SUFFICIENT, BUT NOT GREATER THAN NECESSARY” TO ACHIEVE THE GOALS OF SENTENCING"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010463.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,998 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 663 Filed 06/15/22 Page 17 of 77
Exhibit F.
Catherine Vaughan-Edwards, a friend, former employee, and the mother of Ghislaine’s
godson, relates her experience as a mentee:
The person that I have known for 34 years, is not the same as the Ghislaine so
negatively portrayed by the press and mainstream media. My own experience
is that she is kind, caring and thoughtful and is always there to provide support
as a loyal and generous friend. She has been a mentor, encouraging and
helping me to develop my business and gives her time and advice freely.
Exhibit G.
And, finally, Harriet Jagger, a school mate from age 15, shares Ghislaine’s longing for a
family life:
The last time I saw Ghislaine was in her home in New York a few years ago. I
listened to her as she spoke of her wish to find the security and happiness within
a family unit, she was visibly upset that this, the simplest of things for so many
others had still not been a part of her own life. I felt truly sorry for her. Having
known her large and great family, her love and great respect for her parents and
closeness to her brothers and sisters, I knew this was something she had always
craved. I gave her a huge hug on departing. So I was then thrilled to learn that she
had finally met and married someone and was helping bring up his young
children, but them desperate to hear that this much sought-after joy was so short
lived.
Exhibit H.
A NON-GUIDELINES SENTENCE WOULD BE “SUFFICIENT, BUT NOT GREATER
THAN NECESSARY” TO ACHIEVE THE GOALS OF SENTENCING
Advisory Sentencing Guidelines
As the Supreme Court has repeatedly explained, “a district court should begin all
sentencing proceedings by correctly calculating the applicable guidelines range. As a matter of
administration and to secure nationwide consistency, the guidelines should be the starting point
and the initial benchmark.” Peugh v. United States, 569 U.S. 530, 536 (2013) (quoting Gall v.
16
DOJ-OGR-00010463

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document