This document is page 17 of a sentencing memorandum filed in June 2022. It presents character statements (Exhibits F and G) from Catherine Vaughan-Edwards and Harriet Jagger, who describe Ghislaine Maxwell as a supportive friend and express sympathy for her desire for family life. The document transitions (Exhibit H) into a legal argument citing Supreme Court precedent regarding advisory sentencing guidelines.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the character references; referred to as 'Ghislaine'.
|
| Catherine Vaughan-Edwards | Character Witness |
Friend, former employee, and mother of Ghislaine's godson; provided Exhibit F statement.
|
| Harriet Jagger | Character Witness |
School mate from age 15; provided Exhibit G statement.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court |
Cited in legal argument regarding sentencing guidelines.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer code DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Ghislaine's home where Harriet Jagger visited her.
|
"The person that I have known for 34 years, is not the same as the Ghislaine so negatively portrayed by the press and mainstream media."Source
"My own experience is that she is kind, caring and thoughtful and is always there to provide support as a loyal and generous friend."Source
"The last time I saw Ghislaine was in her home in New York a few years ago."Source
"I listened to her as she spoke of her wish to find the security and happiness within a family unit..."Source
"A NON-GUIDELINES SENTENCE WOULD BE “SUFFICIENT, BUT NOT GREATER THAN NECESSARY” TO ACHIEVE THE GOALS OF SENTENCING"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,998 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document