A transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case number). The defense attorney attempts to refresh Rodgers' recollection using a document regarding Sarah Kellen taking over as Jeffrey Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001. There is some confusion regarding which specific page and paragraph the witness should be reading.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rodgers | Witness |
Being cross-examined regarding his recollection of Epstein's staff structure.
|
| Sarah Kellen | Subject of Inquiry |
Mentioned in a question regarding whether she took over as Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Employer |
Referenced as the person for whom Sarah Kellen became the primary assistant.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, clarifying instructions.
|
| Unidentified Attorney (Q) | Interrogator |
Conducting the cross-examination of Mr. Rodgers.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Mentioned as having a copy of the document being discussed.
|
"Mr. Rodgers, I'll ask you, does reading that refresh your recollection that it was your impression that Sarah Kellen took over as Epstein's primary assistant in the late 2000s -- sorry, in late 2001?"Source
"I didn't see Sarah's name mentioned in here."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,456 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document