This document is a court transcript from the trial 'United States v. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, which was filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, focusing on her mental state (medication use), her refusal to accept a subpoena during a December 20th hearing before Judge Pauley, and her financial inability to hire counsel. The questioning attorney challenges Conrad on whether her behavior of rejecting a subpoena and inviting arrest was 'rational' conduct for an officer of the court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Witness |
Being cross-examined about her conduct regarding a subpoena and her mental state.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named in the case caption (United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas).
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Objects to the line of questioning regarding 'rational/irrational' behavior.
|
| Mr. Gair | Attorney |
Asks for the court reporter to read back a question.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who presided over a hearing on December 20th and advised Conrad to get a lawyer.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge in the current proceeding, ruling on objections.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case caption.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
"I reject the subpoena. I reject it and you're going to have to arrest me because nothing is going to change."Source
"Nobody wants a subpoena served on them."Source
"I understand the underlying reason why we're here is not lawyer or lawyer up... it's whether the underlying fact of the verdict."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (5,080 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document