HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023012.jpg
1.64 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Timeline of legal events
File Size:
1.64 MB
Summary
This document provides a chronological summary of legal proceedings associated with the Epstein case during a specific year, detailing allegations made by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and Ghislaine Maxwell. It covers court filings in January, a federal judge's ruling in April regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and a defamation lawsuit filed by Roberts against Maxwell in September.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia Roberts | ||
| Epstein | ||
| Prince Andrew | ||
| Alan Dershowitz | ||
| Ghislaine Maxwell |
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Court | ||
| House Oversight Committee |
Timeline (3 events)
January: Virginia Roberts files court papers in Florida.
April: Federal judge rules Roberts cannot join Crime Victims' Rights Act lawsuit.
September: Roberts sues Maxwell for defamation in New York federal court.
Relationships (3)
→
→
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (1)
"“The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim.”"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023012.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,490 characters)
January: Virginia Roberts files court papers in Florida claiming that she was forced by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew and lawyer Alan Dershowitz when she was underage. In a sworn affidavit, she provides photographs of her with the prince and with Epstein’s close associate, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. She claims Maxwell worked as Epstein’s madam, which she denies. Dershowitz and the prince deny her claims as well, setting off a series of legal actions between Dershowitz and Roberts’ attorneys that are later resolved in an out-of-court settlement.
April: A federal judge rules that Roberts cannot join the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit and that her affidavit — accusing Prince Andrew and Dershowitz of having sex with her when she was underage — be stricken from the case. Dershowitz said the ruling meant he was vindicated. However, the judge does not address the veracity of Roberts’ claims, writing: “The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim.”
September: Roberts sues Maxwell in federal court in New York, claiming that Epstein’s alleged madam defamed her in public statements in the media. The lawsuit is widely viewed as a vessel for Epstein’s victims to expose the scope of Epstein’s crimes. Several civil lawsuits filed the same year allege that Epstein and Maxwell operated an international sex trafficking operation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023012
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document