DOJ-OGR-00020842.jpg
497 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal proceeding
File Size:
497 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) filed on 02/28/2023. It features a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger before a Judge regarding jury instructions and the legal definition of 'transportation' for illegal sexual activity. The discussion specifically focuses on a flight to New Mexico involving a victim referred to as 'Jane' and whether the intent of that specific travel leg was for sexual activity.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Arguing regarding the interpretation of 'significant or motivating purpose' for travel.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning the attorneys about the requirements for a guilty verdict regarding transportation.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Interjects to answer the Court's question regarding the legal standard for transportation and intent.
|
| Jane | Victim (Pseudonym) |
Subject of the flight to New Mexico; alleged to have been transported for sexual activity.
|
| She | Defendant (Implied) |
The person whose guilt is being debated regarding aiding in the transportation of Jane.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Destination of a flight involving 'Jane'; location associated with alleged sexual activity.
|
Relationships (2)
Court discussion regarding 'she aided in the transportation of Jane's flight'
Arguing different sides of a legal point in court.
Key Quotes (3)
"To be found guilty on this count, must the jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's flight to New Mexico?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020842.jpg
Quote #1
"It has to be a place for which the travel was a significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020842.jpg
Quote #2
"the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020842.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,334 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page16 of 221
A-216
A-216
3135
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 MR. EVERDELL: Right?
2 The travel back to a place where she is presumably not
3 engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant
4 or motivating purpose for that travel.
5 THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question,
7 your Honor.
8 THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the
9 jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's
10 flight to New Mexico?
11 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself
12 into this conversation?
13 THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value
14 it.
15 MS. MENNINGER: I will.
16 It has to be a place for which the travel was a
17 significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.
18 In this hypothetical that they've given in this
19 question, they have a comma in two places. The first place
20 they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not
21 the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to
22 engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out
23 where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New
24 Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to
25 engage in sexual activity.
2 The travel back to a place where she is presumably not
3 engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant
4 or motivating purpose for that travel.
5 THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.
6 MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question,
7 your Honor.
8 THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the
9 jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's
10 flight to New Mexico?
11 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself
12 into this conversation?
13 THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value
14 it.
15 MS. MENNINGER: I will.
16 It has to be a place for which the travel was a
17 significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.
18 In this hypothetical that they've given in this
19 question, they have a comma in two places. The first place
20 they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not
21 the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to
22 engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out
23 where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New
24 Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to
25 engage in sexual activity.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00020842
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document