DOJ-OGR-00015259.jpg
615 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing (response to interrogatories)
File Size:
615 KB
Summary
This document is the first page of a legal filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-00484-JKG). It details Plaintiff 'Jane Doe's' response to the first set of interrogatories sent by the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, who are the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The page contains standard legal preliminary statements regarding non-admission of facts and is marked as a Defendant's Exhibit (J-15-R) in a related criminal case (S2 20 Cr. 330).
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff / Responding Party |
Individual suing the Epstein Estate and Ghislaine Maxwell
|
| Darren K. Indyke | Defendant / Propounding Party / Co-Executor |
Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
| Richard D. Kahn | Defendant / Propounding Party / Co-Executor |
Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
| Jeffrey E. Epstein | Deceased |
Referenced as the Estate owner
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Sued as an individual alongside the Estate
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue of the lawsuit
|
|
| Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein |
Defendant entity represented by executors
|
|
| Panish Shea & Boyle LLP |
Legal counsel for the Plaintiff (Jane Doe)
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the court case
|
|
|
Address of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP
|
Relationships (3)
Identified as Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Identified as Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Plaintiff vs. Defendants in Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JKG
Key Quotes (2)
"Nothing in this response should be construed as an admission by Responding Party with respect to the admissibility or relevance of any fact"Source
DOJ-OGR-00015259.jpg
Quote #1
"Responding Party has not completed his investigation of the facts relating to this case"Source
DOJ-OGR-00015259.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,885 characters)
DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT J-15-R S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP
11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700
Los Angeles, California 90025
310.477.1700 phone • 310.477.1699 fax
11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700
Los Angeles, California 90025
310.477.1700 phone • 310.477.1699 fax
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
3
4 JANE DOE,
5 Plaintiff,
6 v.
7 DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD
8 D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF
9 JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, an individual,
10 Defendants.
2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
3
4 JANE DOE,
5 Plaintiff,
6 v.
7 DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD
8 D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF
9 JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, an individual,
10 Defendants.
Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JKG
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY DEFENDANTS DARREN K. INDYKE AND RICHARD D. KAHN, CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
11
12
13 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn,
14 Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
15 RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Jane Doe
16 SET NO.: One
17 Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Jane
18 Doe ("Responding Party") hereby submits these objections and responses to the
19 First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Defendants CO-EXECUTORS
20 ("Propounding Parties").
21 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
22 Nothing in this response should be construed as an admission by Responding
23 Party with respect to the admissibility or relevance of any fact, or of the truth or
24 accuracy of any characterization or statement of any kind contained in Propounding
25 Party's Interrogatories. Responding Party has not completed his investigation of the
26 facts relating to this case, his discovery or his preparation for trial. All responses
27 and objections contained herein are based only upon information that is presently
28 available to and specifically known by Responding Party. It is anticipated that
12
13 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn,
14 Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
15 RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Jane Doe
16 SET NO.: One
17 Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Jane
18 Doe ("Responding Party") hereby submits these objections and responses to the
19 First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Defendants CO-EXECUTORS
20 ("Propounding Parties").
21 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
22 Nothing in this response should be construed as an admission by Responding
23 Party with respect to the admissibility or relevance of any fact, or of the truth or
24 accuracy of any characterization or statement of any kind contained in Propounding
25 Party's Interrogatories. Responding Party has not completed his investigation of the
26 facts relating to this case, his discovery or his preparation for trial. All responses
27 and objections contained herein are based only upon information that is presently
28 available to and specifically known by Responding Party. It is anticipated that
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY DEFENDANTS DARREN K. INDYKE AND RICHARD D. KAHN, CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
1
1
DOJ-OGR-00015259
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document