PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00030454.pdf
An email dated May 29, 2020, from attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle to a redacted recipient. The email shares a link to an ABC News article regarding the difficulty an alleged victim is facing in locating Ghislaine Maxwell to serve a legal complaint.
EFTA00024529.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 20, 2020, between attorney Robert Glassman and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are verifying the timeline of a victim's 'first trip to New York' by cross-referencing her memory of seeing 'The Lion King' with flight records. The AUSA notes a discrepancy between the musical's 1997 release and the movie's 1994 release, which conflicts with the believed date of the first trip. Glassman clarifies that the victim specifically remembers a Broadway play where Epstein bragged about getting tickets from a famous friend. Glassman also makes a disparaging remark about Ghislaine Maxwell suing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
EFTA00020090.pdf
This document is a 'Touhy Request' dated June 8, 2020, sent by attorney Robert S. Glassman to US Attorney Geoffrey Berman. It requests the production of evidence gathered during the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein for use in a civil lawsuit (Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.). The request specifically seeks photographs, flight logs, videos, correspondence, and trust documents (specifically 'The 1953 Trust' dated August 8, 2019) related to a Jane Doe victim who met Epstein at a Michigan summer camp in 1994.
EFTA00020088.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2020 regarding a 'Touhy Request' for evidence in the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.' in the SDNY. Attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP submits the request, and internal recipients (likely government officials given the nature of a Touhy request) discuss fulfilling it, noting it is similar to a request from 'Kaplan' and does not interfere with ongoing proceedings, with the exception of 'Item 8'.
EFTA00019929.pdf
An email exchange dated December 2, 2020, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle. The AUSA notifies Glassman that Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys intend to file a new bail application, though no specific schedule was set at that time. Glassman acknowledges the update.
EFTA00019467.pdf
An email dated June 8, 2020, from attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP regarding a 'Touhy Request' for tangible and documentary evidence in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. (SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF). The email serves as a cover letter for an attached PDF document, noting that a physical copy will also be sent via FedEx. The recipient's name and contact information are redacted.
EFTA00016896.pdf
This document is an email chain from late 2019 concerning an SDNY investigation, involving Robert Glassman and Nathan Werksman. The correspondence focuses on scheduling meetings, discussing logistical details like a client's mother's overseas location, and outlining topics for discussion related to potential contact with Epstein and/or Maxwell. The emails show an ongoing effort to coordinate in-person meetings in California and establish communication methods for the investigation.
EFTA00016286.pdf
This document is an opposition letter filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe's counsel against Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay civil proceedings in the case Doe v. Indyke. The Plaintiff argues that Maxwell has been actively participating in the litigation from jail (filing answers, issuing discovery requests) despite claiming it is a burden, and that a stay is not required for Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Claims Resolution Program. The letter asserts that the public interest is best served by allowing the civil case to proceed to expose the criminal enterprise of Epstein and Maxwell.
EFTA00014452.pdf
A letter from the U.S. DOJ (SDNY) to attorney Robert Glassman regarding a request for information in the case Jane Doe v. Indyke. The DOJ authorizes the release of FedEx invoices, electronic search warrant documents, and a photograph of Glassman's client found during a physical search of Jeffrey Epstein's residence, while declining to provide grand jury materials.
EFTA00014450.pdf
This document is an email chain from June to August 2020 between attorney Robert Glassman (Panish Shea & Boyle LLP) and a representative of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy Request' for evidence related to the case 'Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.' On August 4, 2020, the USANYS representative responded with attachments explicitly named as relating to information about Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00015263.jpg
This document is page 16 of a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by executors Indyke and Kahn), dated June 3, 2020. The text alleges that Jeffrey Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, and claims these photos are currently held by the federal government. It is signed by attorney Robert S. Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00015261.jpg
This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It lists specific interactions Jane Doe had with Epstein's associates between 1994 and 1999, identifying Ghislaine Maxwell, Juan Alessi, Darren Indyke, Adam Perry Lang, Lesley Groff, Mark Epstein, and Sarah Kellen. The response details roles these individuals played, ranging from facilitating abuse and meetings to providing transportation and making threatening financial demands.
DOJ-OGR-00015260.jpg
This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in litigation against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It itemizes evidence establishing the relationship between Jane Doe and Epstein, including flight logs, phone records from Darren Indyke, and financial records covering rent, tuition, acting classes, and intimate items like underwear. It also alleges that Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, which are currently held by the federal government.
DOJ-OGR-00015259.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-00484-JKG). It details Plaintiff 'Jane Doe's' response to the first set of interrogatories sent by the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, who are the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The page contains standard legal preliminary statements regarding non-admission of facts and is marked as a Defendant's Exhibit (J-15-R) in a related criminal case (S2 20 Cr. 330).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity