010-01.pdf
48.4 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (proposed)
File Size:
48.4 KB
Summary
This document is a proposed court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80447-CIV). The order grants Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a reply to the plaintiff's response regarding a motion to dismiss/strike. The new deadline for the filing is set for June 17, 2010.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Subject of the lawsuit and the motion for extension of time.
|
| C.L. | Plaintiff |
Person suing Jeffrey Epstein; referred to by initials.
|
| Marra | Judge |
District Judge assigned to the case (from Case No).
|
| Johnson | Magistrate Judge |
Magistrate Judge assigned to the case (from Case No).
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
The court where the case is being heard.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2010-06-17
Deadline for Defendant to file a Reply to Plaintiff C.L.'s Response in Opposition.
Southern District of Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (1)
Plaintiff vs. Defendant in Case No. 10-80447-CIV-Marra/Johnson
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,029 characters)
Case 9:10-cv-80447-KAM Document 10-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/04/2010 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 10-80447-CIV-Marra/Johnson
C.L.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
_________________________/
_________________________/
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time in Which to File a Reply to Plaintiff’s
Response to Defendant Epstein’s Motion for More Definite Statement & to Strike & to
Dismiss Directed to Count III of Plaintiff C.L.’s Complaint (DE 9). Having considered
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion and Plaintiff’s counsel being in agreement with the
requested extension, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time in Which to File a Reply to Plaintiff’s
Response to Defendant Epstein’s Motion for More Definite Statement & to Strike & to
Dismiss Directed to Count III of Plaintiff C.L.’s Complaint (DE 9). Having considered
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion and Plaintiff’s counsel being in agreement with the
requested extension, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a Reply to
Plaintiff C.L.’s Response in Opposition on or before June 17, 2010.
Plaintiff C.L.’s Response in Opposition on or before June 17, 2010.
DONE and ORDERED this _______ day of __________________, 2010.
__________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
United States Magistrate Judge
Courtesy Copies all counsel
1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document