DOJ-OGR-00016882.jpg
606 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
606 KB
Summary
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely Ghislaine Maxwell's trial). Attorney Mr. Everdell is explaining to the Court why a potential witness was not disclosed earlier, stating they were still verifying the witness's utility. They discuss '26.2 material' (Jencks Act material) and reference a conversation from 'yesterday' (December 16th) regarding the trial schedule, aiming for closing arguments on the following Monday.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Speaking to the court regarding witness scheduling and 26.2 material.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking clarifying questions about the timeline and previous transcript.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Mentioned by the Court as having noted something in a previous conversation.
|
| Unnamed Witness | Potential Witness |
Subject of the discussion; defense was determining if they had relevant admissible information.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Stamp in bottom right corner (DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
December 16, 2021
December 17, 2021
Court hearing discussion regarding witness disclosure and trial schedule.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court (Southern District of New York) based on the reporter's name.
|
Relationships (1)
Both are referenced in the context of the defense team's interactions with the court regarding witnesses.
Key Quotes (3)
"His 26.2 material would be a one-page or maybe a two-page declaration, which could be reviewed in 10 minutes"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016882.jpg
Quote #1
"So finishing tomorrow or a very short witness on Monday means closings on Monday and then a charge to the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016882.jpg
Quote #2
"I didn't -- there was nothing to disclose at that point because we were still working this out to make sure we had this person lined up"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016882.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,719 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 153 of 197 2694
LCHCmax5
LCHCmax5
1 that person because, at that point, we were still trying to
2 gather the information to see if he could be a witness. I
3 didn't -- there was nothing to disclose at that point because
4 we were still working this out to make sure we had this person
5 lined up and they would be a witness with relevant admissible
6 information.
7 His 26.2 material would be a one-page or maybe a
8 two-page declaration, which could be reviewed in 10 minutes, so
9 I don't think that's an issue. The name of the person is sort
10 of irrelevant. We said it was going to be a witness -- sorry,
11 your Honor. And I believe the Court did say, I'm looking at
12 the transcript on page 25 --
13 THE COURT: This is from yesterday?
14 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, it's from December 16th, so that
15 is yesterday, at page 2534, I had said, I think if we went over
16 in the morning, even if we had this one witness, it would be
17 very brief, so we could have almost a full day on Monday. The
18 Court responds okay. So finishing tomorrow or a very short
19 witness on Monday means closings on Monday and then a charge to
20 the jury. Okay, I'll permit that, so long as it does not
21 interfere with that schedule.
22 So we were on the assumption that we could get this --
23 THE COURT: I didn't know until now that that --
24 something in the course of the conversation, my memory of it is
25 that it was Ms. Menninger who noted that there was one small
2 gather the information to see if he could be a witness. I
3 didn't -- there was nothing to disclose at that point because
4 we were still working this out to make sure we had this person
5 lined up and they would be a witness with relevant admissible
6 information.
7 His 26.2 material would be a one-page or maybe a
8 two-page declaration, which could be reviewed in 10 minutes, so
9 I don't think that's an issue. The name of the person is sort
10 of irrelevant. We said it was going to be a witness -- sorry,
11 your Honor. And I believe the Court did say, I'm looking at
12 the transcript on page 25 --
13 THE COURT: This is from yesterday?
14 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, it's from December 16th, so that
15 is yesterday, at page 2534, I had said, I think if we went over
16 in the morning, even if we had this one witness, it would be
17 very brief, so we could have almost a full day on Monday. The
18 Court responds okay. So finishing tomorrow or a very short
19 witness on Monday means closings on Monday and then a charge to
20 the jury. Okay, I'll permit that, so long as it does not
21 interfere with that schedule.
22 So we were on the assumption that we could get this --
23 THE COURT: I didn't know until now that that --
24 something in the course of the conversation, my memory of it is
25 that it was Ms. Menninger who noted that there was one small
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016882
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document