DOJ-OGR-00008782.jpg
308 KB
Extraction Summary
0
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court document (jury instructions)
File Size:
308 KB
Summary
This document is Page 76 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 56, which explains the definition of 'Redaction' to the jury and instructs them to disregard the reasons for any redactions in evidentiary items.
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ |
Source of document release
|
|
| US District Court |
Implied by Case header 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-19
Filing of Document 565 (Jury Instructions) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court
Key Quotes (3)
"Instruction No. 56: Redaction Of Evidentiary Items"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008782.jpg
Quote #1
"“Redacted” means that part of the document has been taken out."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008782.jpg
Quote #2
"You are to concern yourself only with the part of the item that has been admitted into evidence, and you should not consider any possible reason for the redactions."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008782.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (613 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 565 Filed 12/19/21 Page 76 of 83
1 Instruction No. 56: Redaction Of Evidentiary Items
2 We have, among the exhibits received in evidence, some documents that are redacted.
3 “Redacted” means that part of the document has been taken out. Material may be redacted for any
4 number of reasons, including that it is not relevant to the issues you must decide in this case, among
5 other reasons. You are to concern yourself only with the part of the item that has been admitted
6 into evidence, and you should not consider any possible reason for the redactions.
2 We have, among the exhibits received in evidence, some documents that are redacted.
3 “Redacted” means that part of the document has been taken out. Material may be redacted for any
4 number of reasons, including that it is not relevant to the issues you must decide in this case, among
5 other reasons. You are to concern yourself only with the part of the item that has been admitted
6 into evidence, and you should not consider any possible reason for the redactions.
75
DOJ-OGR-00008782
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document