HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011914.jpg

1.26 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal pleading / court document page
File Size: 1.26 MB
Summary

This document page outlines specific instances where the Plaintiffs (specifically MC2 and Brunel) lost business opportunities due to negative publicity linking them to Epstein's illegal activities. It details three examples involving photographer Michael Avedon, Modilinos Model Agency, and 1 Mother Agency, where relationships were severed or models refused to sign due to fears regarding these alleged associations.

Organizations (3)

Timeline (3 events)

Meeting with Michael Avedon
Email correspondence dated October 15, 2014
Email correspondence dated October 17, 2014

Relationships (3)

Michael Avedon Former business associate/photographer MC2
Plaintiff Brunel Plaintiff/Associate MC2

Key Quotes (4)

"found out some information"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011914.jpg
Quote #1
"could not associate his name with MC2"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011914.jpg
Quote #2
"found some article in internet, which changed her position and she preferred to be placed with another agency."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011914.jpg
Quote #3
"falsely implicating Plaintiffs as being involved with illegal activities with young models"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011914.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,889 characters)

adverse publicity surrounding Epstein and his illegal activities, and the publicity falsely linking
Plaintiffs with those activities; namely, sex trafficking. (Composite Exhibit A).
10. One example of such a photographer was Michael Avedon, who worked with MC2 on
photo shoots. Avedon stopped answering Plaintiffs’ emails and phone calls after having known
Plaintiff for some time. Upon meeting Avedon out one night, Avedon stated to Plaintiff Brunel
he had “found out some information” from some friends of his and that he could not associate his
name with MC2.
11. This statement by Avedon was no doubt a reference to the alleged and false links
between Plaintiffs and Epstein’s illegal activities with under-aged girls. This incident clearly
illustrates an example of lost business on Plaintiffs’ behalf.
12. The second example of a business relationship that was terminated due to Epstein’s
intentional and illegal activities was a very recent one, involving an overseas agency, Modilinos
Model Agency. The owner stated that the model to be placed with MC2 “found some article in
internet, which changed her position and she preferred to be placed with another agency.” This
was relayed to Plaintiff Brunel by e-mail dated October 15, 2014. This amply demonstrates that
Epstein’s intentional & illegal activities continue to cost Plaintiffs’ business income. (Exhibit B
attached).
13. A third example of a lost business relationship can be found in an e-mail dated October
17, 2014 (Exhibit C attached). The director of the 1 Mother Agency, Vladmir Yudashkin, states
that a specific model will not sign with Plaintiff MC2 due to her fear that Plaintiffs’ will force
her into illegal activities. The model bases her fears upon the stories on the internet falsely
implicating Plaintiffs as being involved with illegal activities with young models. This is
3
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011914

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document