This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the logistics of maintaining witness anonymity in the courtroom. Specifically, they discuss preventing the public from seeing identifying information on counsel's screens while ensuring the government and jurors have access to necessary documents.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, managing issues regarding witness anonymity and public disclosure.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Speaking to the court regarding logistics of displaying documents and handling paper copies.
|
| Witnesses | Witnesses |
Mentioned by the court as having been ordered anonymity.
|
| Jurors | Jury |
Discussed in relation to what information they will or will not see on screens.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Opposing counsel mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca regarding receiving paper copies.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on reporter's name and case number format.
|
|
|
Physical location discussed, specifically the construction, screens, and counsel's table.
|
"So the problem we know is that I have ordered anonymity with respect to some witnesses."Source
"We're not keeping the names from the jurors, so that's certainly not an issue."Source
"I don't believe that you can see, you know, a paper document from the back of the courtroom when it's up on the screen."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,661 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document