DOJ-OGR-00011634.jpg

592 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 592 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the logistics of maintaining witness anonymity in the courtroom. Specifically, they discuss preventing the public from seeing identifying information on counsel's screens while ensuring the government and jurors have access to necessary documents.

People (4)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, managing issues regarding witness anonymity and public disclosure.
Mr. Pagliuca Attorney
Speaking to the court regarding logistics of displaying documents and handling paper copies.
Witnesses Witnesses
Mentioned by the court as having been ordered anonymity.
Jurors Jury
Discussed in relation to what information they will or will not see on screens.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The Government
Opposing counsel mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca regarding receiving paper copies.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell)
Southern District of New York Courtroom

Locations (2)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on reporter's name and case number format.
Physical location discussed, specifically the construction, screens, and counsel's table.

Relationships (2)

The Court Legal/Professional Mr. Pagliuca
Direct dialogue in court transcript.
Mr. Pagliuca Adversarial/Legal The Government
Pagliuca discusses providing copies to the government.

Key Quotes (3)

"So the problem we know is that I have ordered anonymity with respect to some witnesses."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011634.jpg
Quote #1
"We're not keeping the names from the jurors, so that's certainly not an issue."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011634.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't believe that you can see, you know, a paper document from the back of the courtroom when it's up on the screen."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011634.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,661 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 43 13
LBNAMAXTps
1 And in order to accommodate paper, there will be, I think,
2 substantial delays during the process. It will require handing
3 out of copies.
4 THE COURT: Get to the solution. So the problem we
5 know is that I have ordered anonymity with respect to some
6 witnesses. The second portion of the problem we know is that
7 the way the courtroom is constructed, screens are available
8 that may show names or identifying information, which I'm not
9 permitting to be made public. What's the solution?
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, they won't be shown to the
11 jurors, so that's not an issue.
12 THE COURT: We're not keeping the names from the
13 jurors, so that's certainly not an issue.
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: Impeachment information won't be on the
15 screen to the jurors because it's not an admitted exhibit. OK.
16 THE COURT: Right. I think the issue is the screens
17 on counsel's table.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't believe -- and I was trying to
19 see this from the back of the courtroom -- I don't believe that
20 you can see, you know, a paper document from the back of the
21 courtroom when it's up on the screen.
22 Certainly, we could turn off these screens over here,
23 or, alternatively, I can give the government paper copies and
24 the government can look at paper copies. So that takes care of
25 the problem. And then that way, we don't have to be
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011634

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document