This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It was filed as an exhibit (Doc 646-10) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the examination of a witness named Ms. Conrad by Mr. Gair regarding her conduct in a previous hearing before Judge Pauley, specifically concerning her financial inability to retain counsel and her remark that a financial affidavit form was 'garbage'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Witness |
Under direct examination regarding previous statements to a court.
|
| Mr. Gair | Attorney |
Conducting the direct examination/questioning.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Opposing counsel, stated 'No, your Honor' regarding objection.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the current hearing.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge in a previous hearing regarding financial affidavits.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named in the case caption.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely SDNY, implied by reporters.
|
"This is garbage."Source
"I can't afford counsel, that's correct, sir."Source
"It was probably a kneejerk reaction, sir."Source
"I'm not going to adopt your mischaracterization, sir."Source
"No. And it has nothing to do with the jury verdict that was rendered against your client."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,922 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document