DOJ-OGR-00014978.jpg

558 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 558 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated January 15, 2025, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on a phone call in April 2021 where Rocchio allegedly defined terms such as 'child,' 'sexual abuse,' and 'nonconsensual' to a group of Assistant US Attorneys (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). Rocchio states they do not specifically recall the definitions given or the context of the notes taken by the AUSAs.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Subject of cross-examination regarding definitions of sexual abuse and prior statements to government.
Ms. Comey AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Mentioned as someone Rocchio may have discussed definitions with.
Ms. Moe AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Mentioned as someone Rocchio may have discussed definitions with.
Ms. Pomerantz AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Mentioned as someone Rocchio may have discussed definitions with.
Mr. Rohrbach AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Mentioned as someone Rocchio may have discussed definitions with.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR stamp and references to AUSAs/government)
The Government
Referenced as the entity Rocchio spoke to in April 2021

Timeline (2 events)

2025-01-15
Court filing date of the transcript document.
Southern District (NY)
April 2021
Phone call between witness Rocchio and government prosecutors.
Unknown
Rocchio AUSAs

Relationships (4)

Rocchio Professional/Legal Ms. Comey
Prosecutor interviewing witness
Rocchio Professional/Legal Ms. Moe
Prosecutor interviewing witness
Rocchio Professional/Legal Ms. Pomerantz
Prosecutor interviewing witness
Rocchio Professional/Legal Mr. Rohrbach
Prosecutor interviewing witness

Key Quotes (4)

"Did you recall discussing this with Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe, Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Rohrbach, and telling them that 'child' is anyone below the age of consent?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014978.jpg
Quote #1
"Do you have any reason to believe that any of those AUSAs would take that down incorrectly?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014978.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't recall specifically what I said during the phone call in April, no."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014978.jpg
Quote #3
"Those are examples of 'nonconsensual.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014978.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,465 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 102 of 158 102
LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Cross
1 Q. Did you recall discussing this with Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe,
2 Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Rohrbach, and telling them that "child" is
3 anyone below the age of consent? Do you recall that?
4 A. I don't have anything on the screen in front of me, so I --
5 I'm not sure what you're referring to.
6 Q. I'm just asking if you recall that at this point.
7 A. No. Sorry. I don't.
8 Q. OK. Do you have any reason to believe that any of those
9 AUSAs would take that down incorrectly?
10 A. I'm not sure of the context under which it was taken. I
11 think, you know, for -- I haven't reviewed it. I didn't have a
12 chance to correct it. I, I really have no idea.
13 Q. OK. Also, you used the term "sexual abuse," and that's
14 nonconsensual sexual touch. Is that correct?
15 A. That is one of the definitions, yes. It doesn't have to
16 be.
17 Q. Well, is that the definition that you gave the government
18 in April of 2021; do you recall?
19 A. I don't recall specifically what I said during the phone
20 call in April, no.
21 Q. Do you recall defining -- do you define "nonconsensual"
22 as -- when someone says no or the person is too intoxicated to
23 give consent or the person is below the age of consent, is that
24 a definition of "nonconsensual"?
25 A. Those are examples of "nonconsensual." It's not an
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014978

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document