Event Details

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge is ruling on a defense request to call victims' attorneys (Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman) as witnesses during the defense's case-in-chief to establish bias or motive. Specifically, the text highlights an issue regarding whether Mr. Glassman told a victim named 'Jane' that cooperating with the prosecution would 'help her case,' while noting the complexities of attorney-client privilege.

This document is page 83 of a court transcript from the sentencing phase of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The defense counsel is arguing for mitigation, highlighting Maxwell's age (over 60), lack of prior criminal history, and positive behavior while incarcerated at the MDC, specifically noting her move from solitary confinement to general population where she teaches English and GED classes to other inmates. The text acknowledges she is being sentenced for 'terrible conduct' but argues she poses no recidivism risk and has been an asset to her prison unit.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Attorneys Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe argue before the Judge regarding the admissibility of questioning the witness about whether she explicitly told the FBI she wanted the perpetrator prosecuted in 2006 versus her internal desire for it to happen. The Judge rules that Menninger can ask if the witness wanted him prosecuted, but limits the scope regarding specific statements told to agents if those statements are absent.

This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, given the case number ending in PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Carolyn is being cross-examined by Mr. Pagliuca regarding her 2009 testimony about using cocaine in Jeffrey Epstein's bathroom and whether Epstein explicitly told her to use drugs. The questioning then pivots to her claim of having sexual intercourse with Epstein, at which point Ms. Comey interrupts to request a definition of 'sexual'.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the permissible scope of cross-examination for a psychology expert witness. The discussion focuses on the concept of 'delayed disclosure' in sexual abuse cases and whether the defense can question the expert about alternative reasons for such delays beyond what was presented in direct testimony.

This document is a page from a court transcript filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding 'Exhibit 52' (identified as a book). The defense argues against providing the full book to the jury due to limited cross-examination and relevance, while the prosecution argues the physical object is necessary for the jury to evaluate its authenticity.

This page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) details a legal argument between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and the Judge regarding the admissibility of phone message logs. The prosecution argues these logs are business records that corroborate victim testimony about calling 'the house' to schedule massage appointments. The document specifically notes that the name of a victim who testified the previous day appears in these messages.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Meder. The testimony focuses on the chain of custody and location of evidence, specifically CDs identified by '1B numbers,' which were found in various locations within a 'house,' including a potential third-floor closet. Meder confirms working for the government to verify these items but states they cannot recall the exact locations where specific CDs were found.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination regarding the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein. The text focuses on Alessi's procedures for answering phones and recording messages in a 'message book' for Epstein, noting that Alessi, his wife, and another personal assistant were all responsible for this task. The page concludes with a legal argument citing Second Circuit case law (United States v. Algamal) regarding the requirements for a custodian of records.

This page is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It features a redirect examination of a witness named Brune by the Court. The discussion centers on the vetting of 'Juror No. 1,' specifically whether the witness knew the juror was a suspended lawyer and why the witness did not alert the government to this possibility, assuming the government had also 'Googled' the jurors.

This document is a page from the trial transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson (likely law enforcement), by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. They are reviewing a video (Government Exhibit 296) showing the initial police search of a residence (likely Epstein's Palm Beach home), describing the layout, and identifying the property manager, Janusz Banasiak, as he is being read a search warrant.

This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies that she gave her address to Ghislaine Maxwell so that Jeffrey Epstein could send her gifts, which included lingerie from Victoria's Secret, a massage book, and Incubus concert tickets. Carolyn also confirms that she massaged Epstein and that Virginia and other females were sometimes present in the room during these massages.

This page is from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a past event where the witness went shopping and horseback riding, specifically establishing that Jeffrey Epstein bought her cowboy boots. The defense attorney highlights that the witness kept these boots for 25 years and wore them in recent years.

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. The witness identifies a person (referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane') from a document and testifies that Jane visited the office approximately five times, appearing to be around 18 years old, and was accompanied by her mother. Attorney Mr. Everdell is also present.

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' recollection of Sarah Kellen's phone number and the general logistical protocols for scheduling flights for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding necessary details like destination and departure time.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on digital forensics, specifically establishing that the witness cannot determine the physical 'geo location' (whether Florida, New York, or elsewhere) of a desktop computer used to create specific exhibits.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell held a leadership role ('lady of the house') over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records to prove they were close associates of Jeffrey Epstein simultaneously. The defense attorney (Mr. Everdell) disputes the government's legal interpretation regarding the supervision of criminal participants.

This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Chapell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a FedEx package sent from 457 Madison Avenue listing 'Cecilia Steen' and 'Jeffrey E. Epstein' as the senders. The package was addressed to a recipient named 'Caroline' (last name withheld) in West Palm Beach, Florida.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated January 15, 2025, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on a phone call in April 2021 where Rocchio allegedly defined terms such as 'child,' 'sexual abuse,' and 'nonconsensual' to a group of Assistant US Attorneys (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). Rocchio states they do not specifically recall the definitions given or the context of the notes taken by the AUSAs.

A transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Judge that they should be allowed to suggest witnesses were manipulated by civil attorneys, citing a witness named 'Carolyn' whose detailed 2008 legal filings and depositions did not mention Ms. Maxwell, implying her involvement was fabricated later. The Court overrules the objection to this line of argumentation at the opening stage but asks for evidence that attorneys explicitly told witnesses what to say.

This document is page 39 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a forensic expert, who explains that forensic evaluations do not automatically assume a victim's report is true. Dr. Rocchio details the methodology used to objectively assess claims, including reviewing literature, administering psychological tests, and cross-referencing third-party information to identify consistencies or inconsistencies regarding alleged sexual abuse and grooming.