You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
2.76 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
6
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
News article / media report
File Size:
2.76 MB
Summary
This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 14, 2006, detailing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights Reiter's push for harsher charges (sexual activity with minors) versus the State Attorney's lighter plea deal, and documents the personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Chief Reiter.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant/Financier |
Accused of soliciting prostitution; age 53; described as super-rich and super-connected.
|
| Michael Reiter | Palm Beach Police Chief |
Age 48; pushed for harsher charges against Epstein; attacked by Epstein's lawyers; referred case to FBI.
|
| Larry Keller | Author |
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer.
|
| Barry Krischer | State Attorney |
Criticized by Reiter for mishandling the case; swayed by Epstein's lawyers.
|
| Lanna Belohlavek | Assistant State Attorney |
Commented on sentencing guidelines (21 months vs 15 years).
|
| Jill Reiter | Spouse of Michael Reiter |
In divorce proceedings with Michael Reiter.
|
| Katherine Fernandez Rundle | Miami-Dade State Attorney |
Commented on Reiter's letter to Krischer.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach Post |
Publisher of the article.
|
|
| Palm Beach Police Department |
Department led by Michael Reiter.
|
|
| State Attorney's Office |
Prosecuting authority (Krischer's office).
|
|
| myspace.com |
Platform used by victims, cited by defense lawyers to impugn character.
|
|
| FBI |
Agency to which Reiter referred the case for federal investigation.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2006-08-16
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of events and jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Source of evidence (phone messages).
|
|
|
Metaphorical location used by lawyers to insult Reiter.
|
Relationships (3)
Reiter pressed for serious charges; Epstein's lawyers attacked Reiter's reputation.
Reiter urged Krischer to disqualify himself from the case.
Article mentions they filed for divorce and have mediation scheduled.
Key Quotes (6)
"He should have let a jury decide whether the victims - and Epstein - were credible."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
Quote #1
"Epstein preyed on girls and denied it. For three years, his wealth and the influence of his lawyers bought him the protection the state attorney owed to the victims."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
Quote #2
"solely because of Reiter's 'craziness'"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
Quote #3
"Reiter, 48, is a loose cannon better suited to be the sheriff of Mayberry."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
Quote #4
"I must urge you to... consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
Quote #5
"It looks like a departure from professionalism"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
Quote #6
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,704 characters)
could face a trial. The police had taken a high school transcript, class schedules and phone messages from Epstein's home that showed he knew the girls were underage. Yet Mr. Krischer was more swayed by Epstein's lawyers, who attempted to impugn the girls' character by showing they had chatted on myspace.com about smoking marijuana and drinking. He should have let a jury decide whether the victims - and Epstein - were credible.
Ultimately, one charge against Epstein finally reflected the age of one victim, and the plea agreement left Epstein labeled a sex offender. With that additional charge, if Epstein had been convicted at a trial, he could have been sentenced to anything from probation to 15 years in prison, Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek said, adding that the recommended guideline sentence was 21 months.
Epstein also won't have to certify to the court that he is receiving counseling, typically required of sex offenders, because he has a private psychiatrist. But without court supervision, who will ensure Epstein is in fact being treated?
The plea deal also drops a federal investigation of Epstein. If a federal investigation was warranted, how does dropping it before completion benefit the public?
Epstein preyed on girls and denied it. For three years, his wealth and the influence of his lawyers bought him the protection the state attorney owed to the victims.
Police chief's reputation helps discredit attacks
By Larry Keller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Monday, August 14, 2006
By Larry Keller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Monday, August 14, 2006
In the case of Palm Beach financier Jeffrey Epstein, it seems, at times, as if two men are accused of wrongdoing: Epstein and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter.
Epstein, 53, was indicted last month on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution solely because of Reiter's "craziness," one of Epstein's lawyers said. His department disseminated "a distorted view of the case" and behaved in a "childish" manner when the grand jury didn't indict Epstein on the charges it sought, another Epstein lawyer complained. To hear the Epstein camp tell it, Reiter, 48, is a loose cannon better suited to be the sheriff of Mayberry. They whisper that he's embroiled in a messy divorce.
Reiter did in fact file for divorce from his wife, Jill, last year, after 24 years of marriage. They have a son, 18, and a daughter, 14. The couple is scheduled to go to mediation next week, Aug. 16. Nothing in the court file suggests their split is particularly ugly.
Reiter incurred the wrath of the Epstein camp as well as the state attorney's office for two reasons. First, he pressed for Epstein to be charged with the more serious crimes of sexual activity with minors. Second, he slammed State Attorney Barry Krischer in blunt language seldom used by one law-enforcement official concerning another because of what he perceived as that office's mishandling of the case.
In a letter to Krischer written May 1, Reiter called his actions in the Epstein case "highly unusual." He added, "I must urge you to... consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases."
In short, Reiter told the county's top prosecutor for the past 13 years that he ought to get off the case. "It looks like a departure from professionalism," Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said of Reiter's letter.
Following Epstein's indictment, Reiter referred the case to the FBI to determine whether the super-rich, super-connected defendant had violated any federal laws.
Reiter won't discuss the case or the broadsides aimed at him. But others almost uniformly use one word to describe the chief: professional.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document