DOJ-OGR-00016640.jpg

625 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (direct examination)
File Size: 625 KB
Summary

This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of expert witness Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), who is testifying about the science of memory, specifically addressing how post-event information, personal motives, and the trustworthiness of information sources can influence the creation of false memories. The witness confirms that people are more likely to accept suggestive information if it fits their prior beliefs or comes from a trusted source.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness / Expert
Providing expert testimony on memory science, specifically regarding post-event information and false memories.
Unidentified Attorney Questioner (Q)
Conducting direct examination of the witness.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Direct examination of expert witness Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Southern District of New York Court
Loftus Attorney

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the case number format and 'Southern District Reporters'.

Relationships (1)

Loftus Witness/Counsel Unidentified Attorney
Q and A format of direct examination transcript.

Key Quotes (3)

"People do seem to be more willing to accept suggestions when it's going to fit with their -- with their prior beliefs or fit with some motives."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016640.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm not sure I know any specific study that sort of shows if people are offered money for a particular memory, that they are more likely to give it to you, but it certainly seems plausible."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016640.jpg
Quote #2
"what researchers find is that people are more likely to accept suggestive post-event"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016640.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,710 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 157 of 246 2452
LCGVMAX5 Loftus - direct
1 form of post-event information can be intentional or
2 inadvertent; correct?
3 A. Correct. Of course, in my studies or the studies of other
4 scientists, we do it deliberately in order to study what
5 happens, what changes it leads to. But out there in the real
6 world, it doesn't necessarily happen deliberately that people
7 are deliberately trying to mislead other people. It can happen
8 inadvertently.
9 Q. Have you conducted any research or are you aware of any
10 research that has indicated that secondary gain or motive may
11 impact the retelling of an event?
12 A. Well, there is some work on motivated false memories.
13 People do seem to be more willing to accept suggestions when
14 it's going to fit with their -- with their prior beliefs or fit
15 with some motives. I'm not sure I know any specific study that
16 sort of shows if people are offered money for a particular
17 memory, that they are more likely to give it to you, but it
18 certainly seems plausible.
19 Q. In any of the studies that you've conducted, has there been
20 an analysis of who provides the post-event information, meaning
21 someone who you trust as opposed to someone you don't trust?
22 A. Yes. There are several studies that are in the literature
23 on the source of the post-event information. And just in
24 brief, what people find is -- what researchers find is that
25 people are more likely to accept suggestive post-event
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016640

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document