This document is page 47 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Tein. The witness denies asking co-workers to lie and refutes an accusation about getting a friend to switch name tags, claiming the situation was a coincidence. The transcript includes objections from an attorney, Mr. Leopold, and a discussion about marking photographic exhibits for the deposition.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. TEIN | Attorney/Questioner |
Questioning the deponent during a deposition.
|
| MR. LEOPOLD | Attorney |
Present at the deposition, making objections ('It's vague and ambiguous') and procedural requests regarding exhibits.
|
| MR. GOLDBERGER | Attorney |
Present at the deposition, instructed to mark an exhibit ('Exhibit 18-001').
|
| Unnamed Deponent | Witness/Deponent |
The individual answering questions, identified by 'A.'. Denies asking anyone to lie and explains an incident with nam...
|
| Unnamed Boss | Deponent's supervisor |
Mentioned by the deponent as someone they informed about a situation, who allegedly offered to help.
|
| Unnamed Friend | Deponent's friend |
Allegedly involved in an incident where name tags were switched with the deponent.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight |
Inferred from the document identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012442' in the footer, likely a U.S. House of Representatives ...
|
"It's vague and ambiguous."Source
"No. I informed my boss about what was going on and he told me that he would help in any way that he can."Source
"Incorrect. It was a coincidence that same night she was not wearing her name tag; she was wearing mine. But I was also not wearing -- I was wearing my name tag. Everyone switches name tags. It just so happens it was a coincidence that same night the people came with the papers."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,202 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document