DOJ-OGR-00016811.jpg

494 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 494 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Young. The testimony focuses on the procedure of past interviews with a subject named 'Jane,' specifically who was present (attorneys, AUSAs, agents) and the nature of the reports generated (summaries, not verbatim transcripts). The witness confirms that Jane never reviewed the reports for accuracy.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Young Witness
Under cross-examination; discussing interview procedures with 'Jane'.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Prosecution)
Objecting to defense questions as 'beyond the scope'.
The Court Judge
Ruling on objections (Sustained).
Jane Interview Subject/Victim
Subject of the interviews being discussed; likely a pseudonym.
Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) Government Attorneys
Present during interviews with Jane.
Jane's Attorneys Attorneys
Present during interviews with Jane.
Young's Partner Law Enforcement/Agent
Present during initial interviews with Jane.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing/Cross-examination of witness Young
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied)
Young Ms. Menninger The Court Defense Attorney (Q)

Relationships (2)

Young Interviewer/Subject Jane
Young testifies about being present in the room for interviews with Jane.
Young Professional Partner Young's Partner
Witness refers to 'my partner' being present.

Key Quotes (3)

"They're a summary of the interview with Jane."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016811.jpg
Quote #1
"In the initial interviews, it was a larger group. Later, in later interviews, we condensed it down to myself and another AUSA."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016811.jpg
Quote #2
"Q. Did you ever ask Jane to review your reports to confirm they were accurate? A. No."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016811.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,151 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 82 of 197 2623
LCHCmax3 Young - cross
1 MS. MENNINGER: Objection. Beyond the scope, your
2 Honor.
3 THE COURT: Sustained.
4 Q. Who was present in the room for interviews with Jane?
5 A. Her attorneys and Assistant United States Attorneys,
6 myself, my partner. In the initial interviews, it was a larger
7 group. Later, in later interviews, we condensed it down to
8 myself and another AUSA.
9 Q. And in your more recent interviews with Jane, who was in
10 the room?
11 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, your Honor. Beyond the
12 scope. I didn't ask about recent ones.
13 THE COURT: Sustained.
14 Q. I think you already addressed this a little bit on direct,
15 but just to be clear, are the reports that were read into the
16 record just now verbatim?
17 A. No.
18 Q. Are they transcripts?
19 A. No.
20 Q. What are they?
21 A. They're a summary of the interview with Jane.
22 Q. Did you ever ask Jane to review your reports to confirm
23 they were accurate?
24 A. No.
25 Q. To your knowledge, was Jane ever shown those reports before
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016811

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document