This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Young. The testimony focuses on the procedure of past interviews with a subject named 'Jane,' specifically who was present (attorneys, AUSAs, agents) and the nature of the reports generated (summaries, not verbatim transcripts). The witness confirms that Jane never reviewed the reports for accuracy.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Young | Witness |
Under cross-examination; discussing interview procedures with 'Jane'.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Objecting to defense questions as 'beyond the scope'.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on objections (Sustained).
|
| Jane | Interview Subject/Victim |
Subject of the interviews being discussed; likely a pseudonym.
|
| Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) | Government Attorneys |
Present during interviews with Jane.
|
| Jane's Attorneys | Attorneys |
Present during interviews with Jane.
|
| Young's Partner | Law Enforcement/Agent |
Present during initial interviews with Jane.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
"They're a summary of the interview with Jane."Source
"In the initial interviews, it was a larger group. Later, in later interviews, we condensed it down to myself and another AUSA."Source
"Q. Did you ever ask Jane to review your reports to confirm they were accurate? A. No."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,151 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document