Young
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
U.S.
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Crutchfield
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Young woman
|
Engaged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Byrne
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective Byrne
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Interviewer subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Young's Partner
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Supervisor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Crutchfield
|
Co authors researchers |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed partner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective Byrne
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Investigator subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | False rape report in Provincetown. | Provincetown, Massachusetts | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A recent trial prep session where the discussion about Ms. Farmer wearing the seized boots occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | An interview with Jane, attended by the witness (Young) and Jane's two attorneys. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cocktail party hosted by Maxwell | Unknown (likely Epstein's p... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cocktail party thrown by Maxwell | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Aseifa meetings (community meetings) where the narrator raised questions about worker compensation. | Mishmar Hasharon | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Direct examination | A direct examination of a witness named Young regarding the nature of interview summaries (302s) ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Interview | The witness, Young, interviewed another witness, Annie Farmer, on multiple occasions. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Young regarding the seizure of boots and a trial prep session. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A redirect examination of a witness named Young regarding FBI protocols for recording interviews. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | A direct examination of witness Young by Ms. Menninger took place as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing of transcript for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Young regarding the process of creating 302 documents from intervie... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings: Cross-examination of witness Young, followed by a request for a sidebar/approa... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court hearing/Cross-examination of witness Young | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Direct examination of witness Young. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Interview | An interview with the witness (Young) took place, which resulted in a typewritten report authored... | N/A | View |
| 2019-10-03 | N/A | Drafting of an interview report. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-19 | Note-taking | Handwritten notes were taken, which later formed the basis for a typewritten report. | N/A | View |
| 2019-09-19 | Note taking | The witness (Young) took a handwritten note. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Interview | An interview with the witness (Young) took place, which was written up by Detective Byrne. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Interviews | A series of interviews began in September 2019 and continued until days before a trial. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Interview | An interview with a person named Jane was conducted, which was later documented in a report. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Report preparation | A typewritten FBI 302 report was prepared from handwritten notes. | N/A | View |
EFTA00038561.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email chain from April 8-9, 2021, coordinating logistical support for Ghislaine Maxwell's evidence review at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Squad C-20 and Special Agent Young requested assistance from other agents to monitor Maxwell and facilitate the review with her defense team and an AUSA from April 13-15, 2021. The emails detail security protocols, including custody transfer from US Marshals, the need for handcuff keys, and room assignments for the evidence review.
EFTA00010334.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson of Edwards Pottinger LLC. The correspondence, dating between September 2019 and January 2020, concerns the transfer of evidence—specifically emails and 'photo booth' style photographs—related to a witness who had encounters with Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor mentions needing the photos to attach to an FBI '302' interview report.
EFTA00008513.pdf
A photograph showing a collection of FBI evidence envelopes and folders lying on a floor. Notable items include an envelope labeled 'Maxwell Security footage', a folder containing a 'Certified Copy of Birth Cert' with a redacted name, and envelopes marked as 'GRAND JURY MATERIAL' and 'ELSUR' (Electronic Surveillance). The files bear the case identifier NY-3027571-BJ.
DOJ-OGR-00001145.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing dated June 25, 2018, associated with case number 201cr7-00330-AJN. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases cited as legal precedent, with decisions spanning from 1985 to 2019. The vast majority of the cases listed are criminal proceedings with the United States as the plaintiff against various individual defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00021083.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated February 28, 2023, presents a series of case law citations to support the legal argument that a plea agreement made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) binds the entire United States government. The cited cases establish that the U.S. government is considered a single entity across all districts, and therefore, an agreement made by one of its attorneys in one location (e.g., West Virginia) is enforceable against federal prosecutors in another (e.g., South Dakota).
DOJ-OGR-00021060.jpg
This document is page xii of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It lists various court cases and federal statutes (U.S. Constitution and U.S. Code) that are cited as legal precedent or authority within the main document, along with the corresponding page numbers where they are referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00020821.jpg
This legal document is a court ruling denying motions filed by the defendant, Maxwell. The court denies her motion for a bill of particulars, which sought more specific dates for alleged sex trafficking crimes, ruling that the indictment's four-year timeframe (2001-2004) is sufficient. The document also addresses Maxwell's motion to compel immediate disclosure of a Minor Victim's prior statements, finding the current disclosure schedule adequate.
DOJ-OGR-00020779.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing in the case against Maxwell, dated April 16, 2021. The court addresses and rejects several of Maxwell's arguments that the indictment is impermissibly vague, specifically concerning the lack of precise dates for the alleged abuse, the inclusion of noncriminal conduct, and the omission of victims' names. The court cites legal precedents to affirm that the indictment is sufficient, particularly in cases involving the sexual abuse of children where victims may struggle to recall exact dates.
DOJ-OGR-00002350.jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists numerous legal cases from various U.S. courts, including District Courts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme Court, which are cited as legal precedent in the associated document. The cases span from 1972 to 2020 and cover a range of civil and criminal matters.
DOJ-OGR-00002350(1).jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists numerous court cases that are cited as legal precedent within the larger document. The cases span from 1972 to 2020 and involve various individuals and corporate entities.
DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
This legal document argues that pre-release waivers of extradition are unenforceable and meaningless because any defendant who flees will inevitably contest the waiver's validity. The author cites numerous court cases, including United States v. Epstein, to support the claim that such waivers are merely an "empty gesture." The document also refutes the defense's counterarguments by distinguishing the specific factual circumstances of the cases they rely upon.
DOJ-OGR-00002164.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 18, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases, dating from 1985 to 2019, that are cited as legal precedent in the main document. The cases cover various federal districts and circuits, with a significant number originating from courts in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021841.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues that plea agreements made by any U.S. Attorney are binding on the entire U.S. government across all federal districts. It cites several court cases establishing this principle and the related rule that any ambiguities in such agreements must be interpreted against the government. The document concludes by stating that a case named Annabi contradicts this established legal precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00021829.jpg
This document is page 'iv' of a legal filing, specifically Document 117 in Case 22-1426, dated November 1, 2024. It serves as a Table of Authorities, listing various court cases and statutes that are cited within the main body of the document. The citations include references to federal court decisions from various circuits and the Supreme Court, along with federal statutes.
DOJ-OGR-00016819.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It records the conclusion of Agent Young's testimony and the calling of the next defense witness, Dr. Eva Dubin (Eva Andersson Dubin). The transcript captures the swearing-in process and the initial spelling of her name for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00016818.jpg
This document is page 89 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It captures a brief exchange during the redirect examination of a witness named Young, where Ms. Comey discusses transcript availability and the Court sustains an objection as 'beyond the scope.'
DOJ-OGR-00016815.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Young. The questioning focuses on FBI interview protocols, where Young testifies that the FBI records interviews with individuals in custody but does not record witness interviews unless the witness is a minor. An attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully objects to a question about whether recording is an option under FBI protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00016813.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It captures a sidebar conversation where counsel Ms. Comey attempts to introduce prior consistent statements of a witness named Jane, which is objected to by opposing counsel Ms. Menninger. The Court sustains the objection on the grounds that it is beyond the scope of the current examination but allows for the possibility of recalling the witness for rebuttal.
DOJ-OGR-00016812.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts a brief exchange during the cross-examination of a witness named Young, where prosecutor Ms. Comey interrupts questioning to request a moment, confer with defense counsel, and approach the bench (a sidebar).
DOJ-OGR-00016811.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Young. The testimony focuses on the procedure of past interviews with a subject named 'Jane,' specifically who was present (attorneys, AUSAs, agents) and the nature of the reports generated (summaries, not verbatim transcripts). The witness confirms that Jane never reviewed the reports for accuracy.
DOJ-OGR-00016806.jpg
This is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Young. The attorneys, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Comey, agree to stipulate the date on which boots were seized to save court time. Ms. Menninger proceeds to question the witness about a discussion concerning Ms. Farmer wearing these boots, which the witness confirms took place during a recent trial preparation session after the seizure.
DOJ-OGR-00016805.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Young. An unnamed questioner reads passages from another document for Young to confirm, describing a person named Jane's first trip to New York, her meeting with Epstein, and her former residence in a gated community in Florida called Bear Lakes. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, then interjects to bring up a matter related to an 'Annie Farmer issue'.
DOJ-OGR-00016804.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Young. The attorney reads portions of a prior report concerning a victim referred to as 'Jane,' confirming that Jane was unsure if she was alone with Epstein and Maxwell, and that she did not recall specific abuse occurring during a trip to New Mexico. The testimony highlights the group dynamic involving Epstein and Maxwell during sexual incidents.
DOJ-OGR-00016803.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Young, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness confirms their involvement in two interviews from December 2019 and February 2020 and is asked to read excerpts from a report. The quoted sections describe an incident where an individual named Maxwell removed the clothes of a 14-year-old girl referred to as 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00016802.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Young by Ms. Menninger. The questioning centers on a report from a November 2019 interview with a person named 'Jane', which was authored by the witness's partner, Detective Byrne. The testimony confirms that Jane was present at Epstein's house and was unsure if Maxwell had ever called her to make appointments.
Reclaiming/Wearing boots
Discussion about wearing/reclaiming boots.
Investigation
Multiple interviews conducted.
Interview notes
A typewritten report prepared by the witness (Young) in December 2019, based on handwritten notes from an interview on September 19th.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity