This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Judge schedules a charging conference for 'Saturday the 18th' and ensures Maxwell's presence. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell then raises a concern that potential defense witnesses are requesting to testify anonymously or using pseudonyms due to safety or privacy concerns.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, scheduling a charging conference.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned regarding her required presence at the charging conference.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the defense, raising issues about witness anonymity.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Assists Mr. Everdell with a microphone issue.
|
| Unnamed Witnesses | Defense Witnesses |
Potential witnesses for the defense requesting to testify anonymously.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in the footer.
|
|
| US Department of Justice |
Implied by 'DOJ-OGR' Bates stamp in footer.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on case number and reporter info.
|
"why don't we schedule the charging conference for Saturday the 18th."Source
"ensure public access and the like, of course, Ms. Maxwell's presence."Source
"we are already getting requests... that at least some of them testify anonymously"Source
"witnesses testify anonymously or under some sort of protection, name protection, whether that's a pseudonym or a first name"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,401 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document