Unnamed Witnesses
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trial | The document is a transcript from a trial, specifically the judge's instructions to the jury rega... | Southern District Court | View |
EFTA00027662.pdf
An email chain from November 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and a redacted recipient regarding travel arrangements for fact witnesses in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence discusses a 'Fact_Witness_Travel_Request' form and coordinates a phone call to discuss flagging issues related to witness travel.
DOJ-OGR-00016134.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a judge provides preliminary instructions to a jury. The judge orders the jury not to discuss the case with anyone and explains that all parties and counsel are forbidden from interacting with them. The judge also details the courtroom's COVID-19 safety measures, including the use of a Plexiglas enclosure with a HEPA filter for witnesses and lawyers during testimony and opening statements.
DOJ-OGR-00022008.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 10, 2020. In it, a defense attorney argues for an adjournment, stating that their small law firm requires more than 90 days to prepare a defense, which involves reviewing at least 25 witness statements and tracking down witnesses. The attorney contrasts their limited resources with the extensive time and resources the federal government used to investigate and bring an indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00017002.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that there are witnesses the defense considered calling but did not because these individuals would have invoked their Fifth Amendment rights to avoid self-incrimination, as the government could have charged them criminally based on prior testimony. The Court acknowledges that the defense cannot offer immunity like the government can, but views the jury charge under discussion as standard.
DOJ-OGR-00016466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Judge schedules a charging conference for 'Saturday the 18th' and ensures Maxwell's presence. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell then raises a concern that potential defense witnesses are requesting to testify anonymously or using pseudonyms due to safety or privacy concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00011685.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a judge instructs the jury on their responsibility to evaluate all evidence and witness testimony with an open mind and to avoid forming conclusions until the trial is over. The judge also informs the jury that due to significant media attention, witnesses have been granted permission to use pseudonyms to protect their privacy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity