HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025899.jpg

2.49 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
6
Organizations
6
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 2.49 MB
Summary

An email chain between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and Noam Chomsky from August 2015. Epstein initiates the exchange with comments on mathematical models ('difference of cubes') and asks if Chomsky has written about the Iran deal. Chomsky replies with a lengthy, critical analysis of the Iran deal, characterizing the US as the 'greatest threat to world peace' and criticizing US/Israeli policy and media coverage.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Noam Chomsky Academic / Political Commentator
Sender of the top email; discusses the Iran nuclear deal and geopolitical views.
jeffrey E. Sender (Jeffrey Epstein)
Sender of the bottom email using address jeevacation@gmail.com; discusses mathematical models and asks Chomsky about ...

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Gallup
Cited by Chomsky regarding public opinion polls.
US intelligence
Mentioned as briefing Congress.
Congress
Recipient of intelligence briefings.
UN (United Nations)
Mentioned in relation to the Nonproliferation Treaty.
Free Press
Mentioned critically by Chomsky for not reporting certain facts.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (2 events)

2015
Signing of the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA)
International
Recurring
5-year review meetings of the Nonproliferation Treaty
UN

Locations (6)

Location Context
Primary subject of the political discussion.
US
Subject of political criticism regarding foreign policy.
Subject of political criticism regarding nuclear weapons and policy.
Used as a comparison for military power and government standards.
UK
Mentioned as a lesser impediment and regarding its press.
Mentioned as a lesser impediment.

Relationships (1)

Jeffrey Epstein Correspondent Noam Chomsky
Email exchange discussing mathematics and geopolitics. The tone is conversational ('Neat indeed').

Key Quotes (4)

"It turns out that the greatest threat to world peace is the US, by a very wide margin, no one else even close, and Iran barely mentioned."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025899.jpg
Quote #1
"Reading the US and UK press is like living in some lunatic asylum."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025899.jpg
Quote #2
"the mathematical model. is quite beautiful... once they have run over and over again, and produced a result you cannot tease them out by any form of reductionism."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025899.jpg
Quote #3
"cannot be found by alogrithm, it is simply the difference of cubes"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025899.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,148 characters)

Neat indeed.
I'm writing about the Iran deal. So far have only sent a form paragraph in response to requests. Below.
Noam
________________________________
On Iran, as usual, I’m a gloomy contrarian. I’m glad the treaty was signed, and it’s kind of fun to watch the Republican lunatics shrieking hysterically as they try to kill it (as they may). And Israeli hypocrisy has gone well beyond being comical. But in fact the whole thing is farcical, in my opinion. In the US, Iran is “the greatest threat to world peace”, intoned constantly from on high, in the media, everywhere. There is also such a thing as world opinion, as measured by such ultra-radicals as Gallup. It turns out that the greatest threat to world peace is the US, by a very wide margin, no one else even close, and Iran barely mentioned. The American population is protected from these unwanted facts by the Free Press: not reported. There is an organization called US intelligence. They brief Congress regularly on the international security situation, all quite public. On Iran, they point out that it has very limited military power, even by regional standards (a small fraction of Saudi Arabia, for example). Its strategic doctrine is defensive. If – a big If – it has plans for nuclear weapons, that would be part of its deterrent strategy. Now who would be opposed to Iran having a deterrent strategy? Answer is clear: the rogue states that rampage violently in the region and don’t want any impediment: the US and Israel, also lesser ones like UK and France. One simple way to reduce the threat of nuclear weapons would be to establish a nuclear-weapons free zone in the region, as has been done elsewhere (over US objections). That’s been advocated by the Arab states for 20 years, with very wide global support, including Iran. It comes up regularly at the 5-year review meetings of the Nonproliferation Treaty, at the UN, again a few months ago, when, again, it was blocked by the US to protect its Israeli client, which has a huge nuclear weapons arsenal and wants to keep it. Again, the population is protected from such facts by the Free Press (though in this case there are some fringe exceptions, and of course the Arms Control literature). Same with the rest of the litany. Reading the US and UK press is like living in some lunatic asylum. I’m wondering whether to write about it – again; have done so repeatedly. It’s like talking to a wall. Iran has an awful government, though by the standards of such US allies as Saudi Arabia, it’s practically heaven.
Nevertheless, better to have the treaty than not to, given the nature of the asylum.
Noam
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 3:36 PM
To: Noam Chomsky <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Re:
the mathematical model. is quite beautiful, though the basic rules are simple , once they have run over and over again, and produced a result you cannot tease them out by any form of reductionism. or algorithm, just like the series 7- 21 -37... cannot be found by alogrithm, it is simply the difference of cubes, . Have you written about the iran deal?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025899

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document