A page from a rough draft transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation, where a witness describes the 'second echelon' of the criminal conspiracy, naming Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Adrianna Mucinska. The witness significantly notes that while Jeffrey Epstein answered some questions in civil litigation, he specifically invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about Mr. Dershowitz, presumably to avoid criminal charges.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah Kellen | Alleged Co-conspirator |
Referred to as 'Miss Kellen'; identified as the 'first name' in the 'second echelon' of the criminal conspiracy.
|
| Nadia Marcinkova | Alleged Co-conspirator |
Identified as part of the 'second echelon' of the criminal conspiracy.
|
| Adrianna Mucinska | Alleged Co-conspirator |
Identified as part of the 'second echelon' of the criminal conspiracy.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Discussed regarding his behavior in civil litigation depositions; answered some questions but invoked the Fifth Amend...
|
| Mr. Dershowitz | Associate of Epstein |
The subject about whom Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment during deposition.
|
| Speaker (A.) | Witness |
Person testifying, recounting details about the conspiracy hierarchy and Epstein's deposition behavior.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee (inferred from Bates stamp) |
"Sarah Kellen, I think I refer to her as Miss Kellen."Source
"Adrianna Mucinska was the full name of those -- that's the second echelon of the -- of the criminal conspiracy."Source
"Jeffrey Epstein had answered some questions in the civil litigation... But when asked in deposition about Mr. Dershowitz, he took the Fifth."Source
"revealing what he knew about Mr. Dershowitz would, you know, cause criminal -- criminal charges potentially to be filed against him."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,245 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document