| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
16
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Romantic |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Johanna Sjoberg
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Johanna Sjoberg
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator potential |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accomplice |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abusive sexual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co participants in abuse |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Alleged sexual contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accomplices |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abusive controlling |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged trafficker victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co defendants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LARRY VISOSKI
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Co conspirators alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator immunity |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Sexual cohabitant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Purchase of a strap-on dildo by [Redacted] using Nadia Marcinkova's credit card. | Guys and Dolls | View |
| N/A | Video review | The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Computer Crime Unit reviewed video from a hidden camera, w... | Epstein's office | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse and rape of victim [A.H.] | Epstein's home (Master bath... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein visits police station with $90,000 donation and Nadia Marcinkova. | Police Station | View |
| N/A | N/A | Reiter observes Epstein with Nadia Marcinkova at a donation event; notes she looked afraid and wa... | Unspecified event | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova | Legal proceeding | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault during a massage | Epstein's property (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Nadia Marcinkova | Epstein Residence (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator trains Nadia in massage techniques | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of video disks extracted by PBSO Computer Crime Unit showing Epstein, Sarah Kellen, Nadia ... | Epstein's Office (on video) | View |
| 2014-04-07 | N/A | New York Academy of Art's Tribeca Ball. | New York City | View |
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Settlement of the Gulfstream lawsuit; Nadia changed handle to 'Global'. | Unknown | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Gulfstream company filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Nadia Marcinkova. | Unknown | View |
| 2011-03-01 | N/A | Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova deposed in civil lawsuits. | Unknown (Civil lawsuit cont... | View |
| 2011-03-01 | N/A | Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova questioned in civil lawsuits; invoke Fifth Amendment. | Legal deposition setting | View |
| 2010-04-13 | N/A | Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova where she invoked the 5th Amendment | Unknown | View |
| 2010-04-13 | N/A | Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova. | Unknown | View |
| 2009-09-18 | N/A | Unsealing of the nine-page federal non-prosecution agreement. | Federal Court | View |
| 2009-09-14 | Flight | Mr. Epstein traveled by helicopter from Palm Beach County to Miami to meet with counsel. He retur... | Miami | View |
| 2009-08-27 | Flight | Mr. Epstein flew on a single engine Cessna aircraft to Sikorsky Helicopters. | northern Palm Beach County | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Nadia Marcinkova visited Epstein over 70 times in jail. | The Stockade | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Nadia Marcinkova visited Epstein over 70 times. | The Stockade | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Jail Visits | Palm Beach custody | View |
| 2005-10-01 | N/A | Flight diversion to US Virgin Islands to evade FBI service of target letter to Nadia Marcinkova. | Airspace/USVI | View |
| 2004-04-20 | N/A | Social event featured on New York Social Diary | New York (Likely) | View |
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
This affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards details difficulties in discovery for a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 10-81111). It alleges that key witnesses Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. Crucially, it lists specific individuals for whom Epstein paid legal fees to prevent them from testifying against him, explicitly labeling Sarah Kellen as a 'procurer of girls' and Nadia Marcinkova as a 'live-in sex slave', while also identifying his personal pilots and household staff.
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
Affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards in Case 10-81111 detailing obstruction tactics by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. The document asserts that Jean Luc Brunel visited Epstein 67 times in jail and that both Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. It explicitly lists Epstein's inner circle (including pilots and household staff like Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova) and notes that Epstein paid for their legal counsel to control their testimony.
This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
An evidentiary photograph (marked EFTA00003632) depicting Jeffrey Epstein from behind, walking on a street at night in New York City near State News and Grace's Marketplace. He is accompanied by two unidentified individuals and is wearing a custom grey hoodie with the initials 'J.E.E' and the phrase 'NADIA'S PROPERTY' printed on the back.
This document page discusses the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically detailing Epstein's plea agreement and the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) that protected potential co-conspirators. It also introduces the indictment against Maxwell, outlining the specific counts and statutes related to conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts.
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining sentencing timelines, gain time restrictions, and confidentiality clauses for Epstein. It explicitly states that in exchange for his guilty plea, the United States will not prosecute named potential co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova) and will suspend the federal Grand Jury investigation.
This legal document page details the terms of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which included an eighteen-month sentence and a provision that the United States would not prosecute his potential co-conspirators, specifically naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document then transitions to discussing the indictment filed against Maxwell, outlining that it contained eight counts, with six proceeding to trial, and provides footnotes detailing the specific charges related to sex trafficking and conspiracy.
This document is a page from a plea agreement involving Epstein, detailing sentencing timelines and conditions regarding 'gain time' during incarceration in Florida. It outlines confidentiality expectations and stipulates that if Epstein fulfills the agreement, the United States will not prosecute named co-conspirators and will suspend federal Grand Jury investigations.
A letter from attorney Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek dated February 17, 2006. Fronstin submits evidence attempting to discredit a witness/accuser (whose name is redacted) by documenting thefts at Victoria Secret and providing a receipt for a sex toy purchase to demonstrate the individual was over 18 and acting voluntarily. The letter also alleges that Detective Recarey is spreading misinformation regarding the Epstein investigation.
This page discusses the legal proceedings involving Epstein and Maxwell, detailing Epstein's plea agreement and the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) protecting his co-conspirators. It outlines the indictment against Maxwell, which included eight counts, and provides footnotes referencing specific Florida statutes and federal charges related to sex trafficking and conspiracy.
This legal document page outlines the terms of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein, in which the United States agreed not to prosecute potential co-conspirators, specifically naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document then introduces the indictment against Maxwell, detailing the multiple federal charges she faced, including conspiracy, enticement of a minor, and sex trafficking.
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated September 2024) summarizing the history of the Epstein and Maxwell cases. It details Epstein's Florida plea deal (NPA), specifically quoting the clause that granted immunity to potential co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. It also outlines the specific legal counts brought against Ghislaine Maxwell in her federal indictment, including conspiracy to entice minors and sex trafficking conspiracy.
This document is a printout of a webpage from New York Social Diary, dated April 20, 2004. It features photographs of various individuals at a social event, most notably showing known Jeffrey Epstein associates Nadia Marcinkova, Sarah Kellen, and Teela Davies posing together in one photograph. The document was processed as part of a DOJ Public Records Request.
This document is page 34 of a legal filing (Document 204) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330), filed on April 16, 2021. It discusses the legal interpretation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically rejecting the defendant's argument that the NPA binds the entire federal government rather than just the Southern District of Florida. The text quotes the specific NPA section granting immunity to potential co-conspirators, explicitly naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova.
This Palm Beach Police incident report from April 2006 details an interview with Johanna Sjoberg regarding her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, including sexualized massages and financial benefits like tuition payments. The report also documents police research into a vehicle (Florida tag X88-EFF) linked to a young woman with the MySpace handle 'pinkpetals', and a review of seized video surveillance footage showing Epstein with Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and possibly Haley Robson.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, documents ongoing investigative activities related to a case involving Epstein. It includes details of vehicle surveillance, background checks on associated individuals, and a scheduled interview with Janusz Banasiak. The main part of the document is a narrative from a January 19, 2006 interview with Johanna Sjoberg, who describes being recruited by Ghaline Maxwell to work for Epstein while in college, a job that evolved from running errands to providing massages to Epstein, his assistant Sarah, and Nadia Marcinkova.
This Palm Beach Police Department investigatory report details surveillance and interviews related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It documents the identification of a vehicle seen on the property and a subsequent interview with Johanna Sjoberg on January 19, 2006. Sjoberg confirmed she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell while in college to work at Epstein's house and provided massages to Epstein, Nadia Marcinkova, and Epstein's assistant Sarah, starting before she was a licensed therapist.
This document is the cover page for a transcript of testimony given by a Special Agent (name redacted) before Federal Grand Jury 07-103 on March 18, 2008, at the U.S. Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. The case involves the United States of America vs. Jeffrey Epstein and co-defendants Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross (a/k/a Adriana Mucinska), and Nadia Marcinkova. Assistant United States Attorney A. Marie Villafana is listed as the appearing counsel.
This document is page 5 of a Non-Prosecution Agreement/Plea Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines sentencing deadlines (late 2007/early 2008), attempts to keep the agreement out of the public record, and crucially grants immunity from federal criminal charges to four named potential co-conspirators: Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. It also suspends pending federal Grand Jury investigations and subpoenas conditional on Epstein's compliance.
This page is a critical excerpt from Jeffrey Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It outlines the sentencing timeline (late 2007) and specifically grants federal immunity to Epstein's 'potential co-conspirators,' explicitly naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document also stipulates that the agreement was intended to remain confidential and details the suspension of the federal Grand Jury investigation.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from April 20, 2006, details an interview with a woman named Sjoberg, who described performing massages for Epstein during which he engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior. Sjoberg stated that despite feeling "grossed" out, she continued because she was paid well, and Epstein also paid for her college tuition and gave her other gifts. The report also documents surveillance of a vehicle at a property, tracing it to Craig Eaton and his daughter, and a review of hidden camera footage that captured images of Epstein with Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Haley Robson.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-02-17 | Paid | Nadia Marcinkova | Guys and Dolls | $0.00 | Purchase of a strap-on dildo, charged to Nadia ... | View |
Question regarding performing sexually on Prince Andrew; Marcinkova invokes the Fifth.
Pressuring her not to cooperate with Grand Jury investigation.
Description of selling invisible pets and modeling career.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity