This document is page 331 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony involves a witness named Edelstein being questioned by Mr. Okula about discussions regarding a 'Westlaw report' and email exchanges concerning 'Juror No. 1' possibly being a 'suspended attorney.' The witness confirms discussing the matter with their partner, Randy Kim, in San Francisco, who had corresponded with Theresa Trzaskoma on May 12th.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
Answering questions regarding knowledge of emails and discussions about a juror.
|
| Mr. Schectman | Attorney |
Defense attorney objecting to a question regarding a father's name.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Prosecuting attorney questioning the witness.
|
| Susan Brune | Attorney |
Mentioned as someone the witness might have discussed the Westlaw report with.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma | Attorney |
Involved in email exchanges regarding Juror No. 1.
|
| Randy Kim | Partner |
Partner of the witness located in San Francisco; exchanged emails with Trzaskoma.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Subject of investigation regarding status as a suspended attorney.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Westlaw |
Source of a report reviewed by the witness.
|
|
| US District Court |
Implied by the Case header (Southern District of New York).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Randy Kim is based.
|
"I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco."Source
"Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms. Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended attorney?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,188 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document