Trove
Sign In Sign Up

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017909.jpg

1.91 MB
← Back to List View Original

Extraction Summary

0
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal research / case law headnotes (westlaw printout)
File Size: 1.91 MB
Summary

This document is page 6 of a Westlaw legal research printout referencing the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001'. It lists legal headnotes (points 25-31) summarizing court rulings on various statutes including the Torture Victim Protection Act, New York negligence law, the Antiterrorism Act, and RICO statutes in the context of 9/11 litigation. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production to Congress (possibly related to broader financial investigations), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific associates.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Westlaw / Thomson Reuters
Source of the legal document
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
U.S. Government
Mentioned in copyright disclaimer

Timeline (1 events)

September 11, 2001
Terrorist Attacks
New York (implied)
Terrorist organization Islamic charities (alleged support) Various individuals
View

Locations (1)

Location Context
New York
Mentioned in relation to state laws (N.Y.McKinney's CPLR 215(3)) and negligence claims

Relationships (1)

Defendants (Generic) → Alleged Support → Terrorist Organization (Generic)
Allegations of providing support or satellite phone batteries

Key Quotes (3)

"Allegation that defendant provided a satellite phone battery to leader of terrorist organization responsible for September 11th attacks sufficiently stated a claim under Antiterrorism Act"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017909.jpg
Quote #1
"Complaint brought under Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA)... failed to state a claim"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017909.jpg
Quote #2
"Negligence claims, in action under New York law arising out of September 11th attacks, would be dismissed"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017909.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,957 characters)

In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005)
10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789
[25] Aliens, Immigration, and Citizenship
KeyCite Torture victim protection
Complaint brought under Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), alleging that various Islamic charities and organizations provided support for terrorist organization responsible for September 11th attacks, failed to state a claim; TVPA provided a cause of action only against individuals. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1350.
2 Cases that cite this headnote
[26] Aliens, Immigration, and Citizenship
KeyCite Torture victim protection
Absent any allegation that named defendants were acting under color of state law, action brought under Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), alleging that various individuals provided support for September 11th attacks, failed to state a claim. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1350.
2 Cases that cite this headnote
[27] Limitation of Actions
KeyCite Injuries to person
Claims, under New York law, for assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress, asserted in action alleging provision of support for September 11th attacks, were time-barred. N.Y.McKinney's CPLR 215(3).
Cases that cite this headnote
[28] Negligence
KeyCite Necessity and Existence of Duty
Negligence
KeyCite Protection against acts of third persons
Negligence claims, in action under New York law arising out of September 11th attacks, would be dismissed for failure to state claims inasmuch as they failed to allege or identify duty owed to plaintiffs by defendants.
1 Cases that cite this headnote
[29] War and National Emergency
KeyCite Private Remedies
Allegation that defendant provided a satellite phone battery to leader of terrorist organization responsible for September 11th attacks sufficiently stated a claim under Antiterrorism Act (ATA), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorists involved in those attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2339A(b).
1 Cases that cite this headnote
[30] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
KeyCite Association with or participation in enterprise; control or intent
Complaint which failed to allege that defendant participated in the operation or management of any enterprise thus failed to state a claim under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorists involved in September 11th attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961 et seq.
Cases that cite this headnote
[31] War and National Emergency
KeyCite Private Remedies
Complaint which failed to allege that defendant took any action that could be considered the provision of material support for terrorist organization responsible for the September 11th attacks thus failed to state a claim under the Antiterrorism Act (ATA), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorists
WESTLAW © 2019 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 6
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017909
View Original PDF

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document