DOJ-OGR-00019239.jpg
552 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (notice of appeal)
File Size:
552 KB
Summary
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on September 3, 2020 (received September 4, 2020) in the Southern District of New York. Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 court order that denied her motion to modify a protective order. The filing cites legal precedents (Pichler v. UNITE, Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., and Brown v. Maxwell) to establish jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Filing an appeal regarding a motion to modify a protective order.
|
| AJN | Judge (Initials in Case Number) |
Presiding judge initials listed in case number 20-CR-330 (AJN).
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue where the document was filed.
|
|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
The court to which Maxwell is appealing.
|
|
| United States of America |
Prosecuting party in the case.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (3 events)
September 2, 2020
District court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify the protective order.
Southern District of New York
Ghislaine Maxwell
District Court
September 3, 2020
September 4, 2020
Notice of Appeal received and filed by S.D.N.Y. Appeals.
Southern District of New York
Court Clerk
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (1)
Case caption lists USA as Plaintiff and Maxwell as Defendant.
Key Quotes (2)
"PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant in the above-captioned case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the district court’s September 2, 2020, Memorandum Opinion and Order denying her motion to modify the protective order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019239.jpg
Quote #1
"“We have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of the motion to modify the Protective Order and the denial of the motion to reconsider.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019239.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,332 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 55 Filed 09/04/20 Page 1 of 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
-----------------------------------x
-----------------------------------x
[STAMP: RECEIVED SEP 04 2020 S.D.N.Y. - APPEALS]
20-CR-330 (AJN)
NOTICE OF APPEAL
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant in the above-captioned case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the district court’s September 2, 2020, Memorandum Opinion and Order denying her motion to modify the protective order. Pichler v. UNITE, 585 F.3d 741, 746 n.6 (3d Cir. 2009) (“We have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of the motion to modify the Protective Order and the denial of the motion to reconsider.”); Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (denial of motion to modify protective order is immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine) (citing Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545–47 (1949)); see also Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir. 2019) (appeal by intervenors challenging denial of motions to modify protective order and unseal).
Dated: September 3, 2020.
1
DOJ-OGR-00019239
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document