DOJ-OGR-00014835.jpg

643 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
File Size: 643 KB
Summary

This document is page 88 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The Judge ('The Court') is addressing the courtroom regarding sentencing guidelines, stating the applicable range is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment. The Judge outlines the legal requirements under *Booker* and 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) for determining a sentence that is 'sufficient, but no greater than necessary.'

People (2)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Presiding over the sentencing hearing, explaining legal guidelines. (Case number PAE indicates Judge Paul A. Engelmay...
The Defendant Defedant
Subject of the sentencing hearing (Implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Supreme Court
Referenced regarding the 'Booker' decision.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Transcription service listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-22
Sentencing Hearing
Southern District of New York (implied by case number)

Key Quotes (3)

"the guideline range applicable to this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014835.jpg
Quote #1
"I am also required to consider the other factors set forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014835.jpg
Quote #2
"I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just described."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014835.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,640 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 88 of 101 88
M6s2Max2
1 THE COURT: Thank you for your patience.
2 As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to
3 this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment.
4 Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called
5 Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one
6 factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate
7 sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set
8 forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include
9 the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history
10 and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence
11 imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote
12 respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the
13 offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to
14 protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to
15 provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care,
16 or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of
17 sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any
18 pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted
19 sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who
20 have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide
21 restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the
22 offense.
23 I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no
24 greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just
25 described. I have given substantial thought and attention to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. . .
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014835

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document