DOJ-OGR-00014627.jpg

631 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / jury instructions
File Size: 631 KB
Summary

This document is page 227 of the jury instructions (Charge) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on August 10, 2022. The text outlines legal standards for considering co-conspirator statements made in the defendant's absence and introduces Instruction No. 39 regarding 'Conscious Avoidance.' The judge explains that the jury may consider whether the defendant 'deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would have been obvious' when determining if she acted knowingly.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Defendant Accused
Subject of the jury instructions regarding guilt, conspiracy, and conscious avoidance (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on Ca...
The Court/Judge Speaker
The person delivering the instructions ('I want to instruct you...').
Coconspirator Alleged Accomplice
Mentioned in the context of admissibility of their statements/acts against the defendant.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
The Government
Required to prove the defendant acted knowingly.
DOJ
Department of Justice, indicated by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Filing of the jury charge transcript.
Court
Defendant Jury Judge
Unknown
Delivery of Instruction No. 39: Conscious Avoidance.
Courtroom
Judge Jury

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.

Relationships (1)

Defendant Legal/Criminal Association Coconspirator
Instructions discuss how acts of a coconspirator affect the defendant's guilt.

Key Quotes (3)

"Instruction No. 39: Conscious Avoidance."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014627.jpg
Quote #1
"you may also consider whether the defendant deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would have been obvious."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014627.jpg
Quote #2
"before you may consider the statements or act of a coconspirator... you must first determine that the acts and statements were made during the existence and if in furtherance of the unlawful scheme."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014627.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,587 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 227 of 257 3061
LCKCmax9 Charge
1 acts were done and statements were made in the defendant's
2 absence and without her knowledge. However, before you may
3 consider the statements or act of a coconspirator in deciding
4 the issue of the defendant's guilt, you must first determine
5 that the acts and statements were made during the existence and
6 if in furtherance of the unlawful scheme. If the acts were
7 done or the statements made by someone whom you do not find to
8 have been a member of the conspiracy at the time of the acts or
9 statements or if they were not done or said in furtherance of
10 the conspiracy, they may not be considered by you as evidence
11 against the defendant.
12 Instruction No. 39: Conscious Avoidance.
13 This includes my instruction on the crimes charged in
14 the indictment, but before I move on to my remaining
15 instructions, I want to instruct you on the instruction of
16 conscious avoidance.
17 Each of the counts charged in the indictment requires
18 the government to prove the defendant acted knowingly. As I've
19 already defined that term, if a person is actually aware of a
20 fact, then she knows that fact, but in determining whether the
21 defendant acted knowingly, you may also consider whether the
22 defendant deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would
23 have been obvious.
24 To be clear, the necessary knowledge on the part of
25 the defendant with respect to any particular charge cannot be
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014627

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document